AS all Professors of Learning amongst the Chaldaeans, were di∣stinguished from the rest of the People by the common Deno∣mination of the Country, Chaldaeans; so were they distinguish'd amongst themselves into Sects, denominated from the several parts of the Country, wherin they were seated: whereofa 1.1 Pliny and b 1.2 Strabo mention Hipparenes from Hipparenum, a City in Mesopo∣tamia; Babylonians, from Babylon; Orchenes, (c 1.3 a third Chaldaick Doctrine) from Orchoë a City of Chaldaea; and Borsippenes, from Borsippe, another City of Babylonia dedicated to Apollo and Diana.
The history of the Chaldaick philosophy by Thomas Stanley.
About this Item
- Title
- The history of the Chaldaick philosophy by Thomas Stanley.
- Author
- Stanley, Thomas, 1625-1678.
- Publication
- London :: Printed for Thomas Dring ...,
- 1662.
- Rights/Permissions
-
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
- Subject terms
- Philosophy, Ancient -- Early works to 1800.
- Zoroastrianism -- Early works to 1800.
- Link to this Item
-
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61291.0001.001
- Cite this Item
-
"The history of the Chaldaick philosophy by Thomas Stanley." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61291.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 7, 2025.
Pages
Page 15
And thoughd 1.4 Diodorus prefer the Chaldaeans before the Graecians, for their perseverance in the same Doctrines without Innovations; yet we must not infer thence, that there was an universal consent of Doctrine amongst them; but only, that each of them was constant in belief, and maintenance of his own Sect, without introducing any new Opinion. For, that amongst these Sects there was no ab∣solute agreement, is manifest from Strabo, who adds thate 1.5 they did, (as in different Sects) assert contrary Doctrines;f 1.6 some of them calcu∣lated Nativities, others disapproved it; Whenceg 1.7 Lucretius,
The Babylonick Doctrine doth oppose The Chaldee, and Astrology ore'throws.
Notes
-
a 1.1
lib. 6. c. 26.
-
b 1.2
lib. 16. p. 739.
-
c 1.3
lib.
-
d 1.4
supra ci∣tat.
-
e 1.5
loc. cit.
-
f 1.6
loc. cit.
-
g 1.7
lib.