The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.

About this Item

Title
The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.
Author
Stanley, Thomas, 1625-1678.
Publication
London :: Printed for Humphrey Moseley and Thomas Dring :
1656.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Philosophy, Ancient -- Early works to 1800.
Philosophy -- History.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

Sect. III.

THat the first of these three Natures cannot be multiplyed, who is but one, the principle and cause of all other Divini∣ty, is evidently proved by Platonists, Peripateticks, and our Di∣vines. About the second (viz.) The Angelick and Intellectuall, Platonists disagree. Some (as Proclus, Hermias, Syrianus, and ma∣ny others) betwixt God and the rationall Soul place a great number of creatures; part of these they call 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Intelligi∣ble, part intellectuall; which termes, Plato sometimes confoun∣deth, as in his Phaedo. Plotinus, Porphyrius, and generally the most refined Platonists, betwixt God and the Soul of the World, as∣signe only one Creature, which they call the Son of God, be∣cause immediately produced by him. The first opinion complies most with Dionysius Areopagita, and Christian Divines, who as∣sert the number of Angells to be in a manner infinite. The second is the more Philosophick, best suiting with Aristotle and Plato, whose sense we only purpose to expresse; and therefore will de∣cline the first path (though that only be the right) to pursue the latter.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.