The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.

About this Item

Title
The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.
Author
Stanley, Thomas, 1625-1678.
Publication
London :: Printed for Humphrey Moseley and Thomas Dring :
1656.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Philosophy, Ancient -- Early works to 1800.
Philosophy -- History.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. VI.

Of Comprehension.

a 1.1 COmprehension (〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉) was first used in this sence by Zeno, by a metaphor taken from things apprehended by the hand;b 1.2 which allusion he exprest by action. For, shewing his hand with the fingers stretched forth, he said, such was Phantasy: then bending them a little, said, such was Assent; then compressing them, and clutching his fist, such was Comprehen∣sion.

c 1.3 Comprehension is a firm and true knowledge, non-compre∣hension the contrary; for some things we only think that we

Page 25

see, hear, or feel, as in dreams and frenzies; other things we not only think, but, truly do see, or hear, or feel. These latter, all (but the Academicks and Scepticks) conceive to fall under firm knowledge, the other, which we imagine in dreams or frenzy are false.

d 1.4 Whatsoever is understood, is comprehended by the minde, one of these two waies, either by evident incursion (which Laer∣tius calls by sense) or by transition from evidence (Laertius, collecti∣on by demonstration) of which latter there are three kinds, by Assimilation, by Composition, by Analogy.

By incurrent evidence is understood white and black, sweet and soure.

By Transition, from evidents: by Assimilation is understood So∣crates by his Picture: by Composition, as of a horse and a man is made a Centaure; for putting together the limbes proper to both species, we comprehend by phantasy that which was neither horse nor man, but a Centaur compounded of both.

By Analogy, things are understood two waies; either by aug∣mentation; or, when from common ordinary men, we by aug∣mentation phansy a Cyclops, who not like

Men that with Cares gifts are fed: But, some tall hill erects his head.

Or by Diminution, as a Pigmey.e 1.5 Likewise the Center of the earth is understood by analogy from lesser Globes.

To these kinds add,f 1.6 Comprehension by transference, as eyes in the breast; by contrariety, as death; by transference, as dicibles and place; by privation, as a man without hands; just and good are understood naturally.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.