The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.

About this Item

Title
The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.
Author
Stanley, Thomas, 1625-1678.
Publication
London :: Printed for Humphrey Moseley and Thomas Dring :
1656.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Philosophy, Ancient -- Early works to 1800.
Philosophy -- History.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

Page 53

CHAP. XXIX.

Of Moods.

a 1.1 SYllogistick, conclusive Reasons are disposed into Moods. Of Moods there are two kinds, the first simple, properly called a Mood, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, defined a kind of figure of the Reason, as thus,

If the first is, the second is, But the first is, Therefore the second is.

(It is observable by the way, that the Stoicks for letters used numbers.) The other compounded, called 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, as being con∣sistent of both reason and Mood, as,

If Plato liveth, Plato breatheth, But the first, Therefore the second.

This is used in a long Syntax, that it be not necessary to speak a long assumption, or a long inference, but they abbreviate them thus, but the first, therefore the second.

Of Moods or Tropes there are two kinds, one of indemonstra∣bles, so termed, not that they cannot be demonstrated, but be∣cause they conclude so evidently, that they need not be repr∣ved; the other of demonstrables.

Of Indemonstrable Moods, there are (according to Chrysippus) five, according to* 1.2 others more or lesse.

The first, wherein every reason consists of a connex, and an an∣tecedent from which beginneth the connex, and the consequent is inferred, as,

If the first, then the second, But the first, Therefore the second.

The second indemonstrable is, which, by the consequent of the connex, and the contrary of the consequent, hath a conclusion contrary to the antecedent, as,

If it is day, 'tis light, But it is night, Therefore, it is not day.

Page 54

The third is, that which by a negative complication, and one of those which are in the complication, inferrs the contrary to that which remains, as,

Plato is not both dead and alive, But Plato is dead, Therefore Plato is not alive.

The fourth is that which by a disjunctive, and one of those which is in the disjunctive, concludeth the contrary to that which remains, as,

Either it is the first or second, But it is the first, Therefore it is not the second.

The fift is that wherein the whole reason is connected by a disjunctive, and one of those which are in the disjunctive of the contrary, inferreth the rest, as,

Either it is night, or it is day, But it is not night. Therefore it is day.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.