The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.

About this Item

Title
The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.
Author
Stanley, Thomas, 1625-1678.
Publication
London :: Printed for Humphrey Moseley and Thomas Dring :
1656.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Philosophy, Ancient -- Early works to 1800.
Philosophy -- History.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

Page 2

CHAP. II.

His institution of a Sect.

a 1.1 S. Ocrates being dead, of whom he learned tolerance and apa∣thy, he made choice of Cynosarges, a Gymnasium at Athens just without the gates, as of the fittest place in which he might dis∣course of Philosophy.b 1.2 It was so called upon this occasion. Didy∣mus the Athenian sacrificing in his own house, a white dog that was by, snatcht the Victim, and running away with it, laid it down in another place; Didymus much troubled thereat, consult∣ed the Oracle, which enjoined him to erect a Temple in that place where the Dog had laid down the Victim, and to dedicate it to Hercules, which was called Cynosarges, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, The Tem∣ple of the white Dog.c 1.3 Hence Antisthenes & his folloers were call∣ed Cynicks, and, by those that disapproved their institution, Dogs; Antisthenes himself being termed 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the sincere Dog.

He first doubled his old fordid Cloak, and wore it alone [with∣out a Coat] as Diocles affirmeth; he carried likewise a staffe and fatchell. Neanthes saith, he first used a single Cloak. Sosicrates in the third of his Successions, saith, Diodorus the Aspendian wore a long beard, and carried a staffe and Wallet.

d 1.4 His assertions were these, that Vertue may be acquired by teach∣ing; that those persons are noble, who are Vertuous; That Vertue was self∣sufficient to Felicity, not needing any thing but a Socratick Courage; That Vertue consisteth in Actions, not requiring many words nor much learning, and is self-sufficient to wisdom, for all other things have a re∣ference thereto; That insamy is good and equall to labour, and that a wise man ought not to govern the Commonwealth according to the Laws in force, but according to Vertue; That a wise man, to have issue, may make choice of beautifull women, and love, for a wise man only knoweth what ought to be loved.

Diocles addeth these; That nothing is new to a wise man; That a good man deserveth love, that vertuous persons are friends; that wee ought to get assistance in War, valiant and just; that vertue is an Ar∣mour never can be taken from us; That it is better with some few good men to oppose all the wicked, then with many wicked men to contend with few good; Observe your Enemies, for they first find out your faults; Esteem a just man more then a neighbour; The same vertue belongeth to man and to woman; those things are good whch are honest, ill which are dishonest; All things esteem strange; Wisdom is the safest fortification, for 〈◊〉〈◊〉 neither fall away, nor can be betray'd; In these inexpugnable things we ought to build Forts, by meditation.

e 1.5 Agellius saith, he esteemed Pleasure the greatest ill, whence hee used to say, I had rather be mad, then be addicted to pleasure.

Page 3

f 1.6 As to the opinion of the Cynicks in generall (not esteeming them, saith Laertius, a meer form and institution of life, but a true Sect of Philosophy) they were these.

They took away, with Aristo the Chian, Dialectick and Physick, and only admitted Ethick; whence, what some said of Socrates, Diocles applyed to Diogenes, affirming he used the same expressions, that we ought to enquire,

What good and ill Our ouses fill.

They likewise reject the liberall Sciences, whence Antisthenes said, those who have acquired Temperance, ought not to study any learning, left by other things they be diverted. Geometry like∣wise, Musick, and the like, they wholly took away. Whence Diogenes, to one that shew'd him a Watch, It is an excellent inven∣tion, saith he, against supping too late. And to one that entertain'd him with Musick;

Wisdome the greatest Citties doth protect; But Musick cannot one poor house direct.

They likewise, as the Stoicks, affirmed to be happy to live ac∣cording to Vertue, as Antisthenes, in his Hercules; for there is a kinde of affinity betwixt these two Sects, whence the Stoicks as∣serted Cynisme to be the neerest way to Vertue, and so lived Zeno the Cittiean.

Their diet was slender, their food only such as might satisfie Nature, their Cloakes sordid; they despised riches, glory, and nobility: Some of them fed only on hearbs and cold water, living under such shelters as they could finde, or in Tubbs, as Diogenes did, who affirmed, it was proper to the Gods to want nothing, and that those who stand in need of fewest things, come neerest to the Gods.

They held also, according to Antisthenes in his Hercules, that Vertue may be acquired by Learning, and that it cannot be lost; that a wise man deserves to be loved, and never sinneth, and is a friend to such as are like him, and trusteth nothing to Fortune.

They took away with Aristo the Chian, all things between Vertue and Vice.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.