The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.

About this Item

Title
The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley.
Author
Stanley, Thomas, 1625-1678.
Publication
London :: Printed for Humphrey Moseley and Thomas Dring :
1656.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Philosophy, Ancient -- Early works to 1800.
Philosophy -- History.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The history of philosophy, in eight parts by Thomas Stanley." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A61287.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 9, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. III.

How he heard Plato.

a 1.1 HAving attained the age of 17. years, he went (in obedience to the Pythian Oracle, which advised him to addict himself to Philosophy) to Athens, Laertius saith (out of Apollodorus) that he was then but seventeen years old, in which year▪ Nausigenes was Archon; Dionysius Halicarassaeus saith, it was the year fol∣lowing, at what time Polyzelus was Archon, perhaps it was upon Nausigenes's going out of his Office, whom Polyzelus succeeded. Butb 1.2 Eumenus is much mistaken, who saith, he was thirty years old when hee came first to Plato, perhaps (as Nunnesius con∣jectures) because he had read in Plato, that Dialectick ought not to be studied till the thirtieth year. And no lesse erre Ammonius, (if he be Author of that Life) and Olympiodorus, who affirm, that

Page 4

Aristotle coming to Athens in the seventeenth year of his age, heard Socrates three years, whereas Socrates was put to death when Laches was Archon, thirty two years before Nausigenes, under whom Aristotle was seventeen years old.

Being recommended to Plato, he became his Disciple, and so continued twenty years, as an Epistle of his to Philip (cited by the old Interpreter of his life) did testifie.

Plato much loved him, and admired his acutenesse of appre∣hension, and diligence in study; for which (c 1.3 Philoponus saith) Plato used to call him the Minde of the Schoole; and whend 1.4 he was not at his Lectures, he would say, The Intellect is not here, or, as Rhodiginus, The Philosopher of truth is absent. And compa∣ring his acutenesse with the dulnesse of Xenocrates, Plato was wont to say,e 1.5 What an horse, and what an asse have I to yoke toge∣ther: Xenocrates needs a spur, Aristotle a bit.

f 1.6 Whilst he lived with Plato, he was extreamly studious, and given to reading, insomuch that Plato called his house, the house of the great Reader, and would often say,g 1.7 Let us go to the great Readers house. This may be confirmed by that great number of antient Authors which are cited in his works. And thoughh 1.8 La∣ertius (either in his own, or Carneades's words) saith, that Ari∣stotle hath thrust in as many sentences of old Authors in his writings, as both Zeno and Chrysippus; yet, every one that is ac∣quainted with the writings of Aristotle, knoweth how judici∣ously and concisely he giveth an account of their opinions, not for ostentation, but disquisition.

Some report there was a great enmity betwixt Plato and Aristotle,i 1.9 which first arose from Plato's dislike of his manner of habit: For, Aristotle wore rich garments, and rich shooes, and contrary to Plato's rule, cut his hair short, and wore rings. He had likewise (say they) a scornfull derision in his look, and te∣nacious contradiction in his discourse, which Plato not appro∣ving, preferred before him Xenocrates, Speusippus, Amyclas, and others, to whom he communicated his Doctrine and many fa∣vours; but repudiated Aristotle, who thereupon,k 1.10 whilst Plato was yet alive, set up a School in opposition to him, in the Lyce∣um: at which ingratitude, lato much troubled, said, Aristotle kicks at us as young Colis at the damme that foaled them, when they have sucked their sill, andl 1.11 for that reason, usually called Aristotle the Colt.

m 1.12 They add, that Xenocrates being gone into his Country, and Speusippus not well, Aristotle came into Plato's School with some of his followers, and circumvented him with fallacious argu∣ments, whereupon Plato retired to his own house, and there taught privately, leaving Aristotle in possession of the Schoole, which he kept, till Xenocrates returning, ejected him, and rein∣stated Plato. The chiefe author of this report seemes to have

Page 5

been Aristoxenus, cited byn 1.13 Eusebius, who aso 1.14 Suidas observes, assoon as Aristotle was dead, cast many aspersions upon him, out of a malitious revenge, because Aristotle preferred Theophra∣stus before him in the succession of the School, notwithstanding that Aristoxenus had gained a great name and credit among the Disciples.

But as Ammonius argues; it is not likely that Aristotle, if he would, could have ejected Plato out of the School, or have ob∣tained licence to erect a new one in opposition to him; for as much as at the same time, Charias and Timotheus, Plato's kins∣men, were in great power, and Generalls of the Athenian for∣ces. Yet, some there are who affirm this, grounding it only on Aristotles contradicting of Plato in many things; to which Ammo∣nius answers, that Aristotle doth not simply contradict Plato▪ but those who misinterpret his writings. For, if he do sometimes contradict Plato, what wonder? seeing that therein he followeth Plato his Author, whose saying it was, that Truth ought to be preferred before all things; as also that saying, Socrates indeed is dear, but Truth most dear: And elsewhere, What Socrates saith, we must not so much regard, as we ought to be solicitous concerning Truth. The same course Aristotle took, if at any time he confuted Plato's assertion, therein obeying him, by fol∣lowing the Truth, and it is observed byp 1.15 some, that he is very sparing in naming him, where he opposeth his doctrine, and that thrice he makes honourable mention of him in hisq 1.16 Rheto∣rick, his Book of the World, (if that be his) and hisr 1.17 Problems.

True therefore it is, (ass 1.18 Apollodorus, Dionysius Halicarnassaeus, but especially Aristotle himselfe, in hist 1.19 Epistle to Philip, af∣firm,) that he was a constant, sedulous hearer of Plato twenty years,u 1.20 unto the thirty seventh of his age, even untill Plato died, and then was so great an honourer of his memory, that in te∣stimony of his extraordinary affection, he erected an Altar to him, bearing this inscription:

x 1.21 This Altar Aristotle's hand did raise To Plato, whom the impious must not praise.

y 1.22 Olympiodorus speaking of the honour which Aristotle gave to his Master, confirmeth it by this argument, that he writ a whole oration in commendation of Plato, wherein he first made a relation of his life, then praised him. He adds, that Aristotle in his Elegies to Eudemus, extolls him thus:

And coming to the fam'd Cecropian Town, In signe of friendship did an Altar raise To him, whom impious persons must not praise: Who straying man to vertue did restore Much by his precept, by example more.

Page 6

One to the Gods so pious, good to men, No future age must think to see again.

z 1.23 Some affirm, that whilst he lived with Plato, he profess'd Medicine, and kept a shop: but thosea 1.24 Aristocles confutes.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.