The extravagant shepherd, the anti-romance, or, The history of the shepherd Lysis translated out of French.

About this Item

Title
The extravagant shepherd, the anti-romance, or, The history of the shepherd Lysis translated out of French.
Author
Sorel, Charles, 1602?-1674.
Publication
London :: Printed for Thomas Heath,
1653.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A60922.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The extravagant shepherd, the anti-romance, or, The history of the shepherd Lysis translated out of French." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A60922.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 17, 2024.

Pages

The Third BOOK

PResents us with that pleasant salley of Lysis at the Play-house, where he took all things for real; his desire to be acquainted with some of his own Profes∣sion might easily transport him so far. And that at the Painters, tells us he was one of those who imagine others can think of nothing but them. But I hasten to the Banquet of the Gods, which takes up the best part of this Book. My Author hath been somewhat large on the several particulars of that relation; which I con∣ceive he hath done not only to shew he hath done these Divinities no injury, nor said any thing of them which some Poet hath not before hinted, but also to acquaint the world, that after the reading of his Banquet, and what he hath said on it, who∣ever shall quote any of these buffl'd Divinities, shall be taken for no wiser then those who sometimes ador'd them, and shall thenceforward forfeit is wit.

There are in the beginning five reasons of the Dew. The Poets had in a manner but one, and that was, that it was the terms of Aurora, yet can they not truly tell us why this Aurora should shed tears thus every day. But they say it was for the death of her son Memnon. What a pittiful Divinity is this, to weep ever since the war of Troy, where this Memnon was kill'd? But who sees not this slly shift? If a Prince or Nobleman dye, Aurora must weep as if she were one of his friends, or mourn for him. Clarimonds imaginations are far beyond this, especially the last, where he saies it is that the horses of the Sun shake their mains as they come out of the sea.

Why may not the Sun be thought to make use of a Night-cap, since he wants rest sometimes as much as ever did Hobson the Carrier.

But for Jupiters hearing from his Palace the addresses of men, I refer you to Lu∣qian, who saies that when he had a minde to hear their prayers, he opens certain holes, and listned and when he was weary shut them again.

Page [unnumbered]

Juno's avarice, and Pallas's divers professions are such as the Poets have attri∣buted to them. But that Invention of the Gods Linnen is Clarimond's; there was never any Poet could tell us what became of the thread of mens lives. Cupid must needs be treated as a Child, since the Poets say he was hardly able to draw the cur∣tains of his mothers bed when she lay with Mars, which is that made Vulcan so jealous of Mercury, whom the Poets have made a fine example for men to instruct them in cheats and rogueries; and his discourse to Charon is as like that of a crafty Mountebank as can be. But where he is troubled that he cannot find some Gods he was to invite, I cannot omit a fiction of Ariosto's, an Angel, wanting Silence to bring an Army upon some enterprise without noise, went to look for her in those places where it is forbidden to speak, as in Monasteries; but there he finds Discord with her black and gray hair, which seem'd to fight one with another: Her hands were full of Chancery-Bills and Law-writings, and she had about her an Army of Councellors and Sollicitors; she sate also President at a Chapter, when the Monks being on the election of a Prior, divide into such factions, that the Breviaries do mighty execution on the bald pates. What need had this malicious Poet thus to abuse the Monks, who are not all naught, and to scandalize a Religion he had be∣fore defended? But what a simple Angel hath he pitch'd on, that was to seek what he knew not where to find? 'Tis an abuse of those divine Spirits, and him whose Agents they are.

Vulcan was the fittest for the Kitchin, as being always neerest the fire. Nor was Pythagonas less for the sauces, since he was the best acquainted with herbs and fruits. And what is said of him and the other Philosophers, is home to their Tenets.

The Raillerie which follows along is obvious, as that of taking down the Signes by Brontes and Pyragmon, who are Vulcan's Kitchin-boyes; the divers entries of the Gods: That Aesculapius is Physitian; the Gods had need of one ever since Homer affirm'd they might be hurt or sick. The Arms of the Gods, may make us laugh at their Statues.

'Tis Fate makes Terminus eat, that is, what he hath decreed must come to pass, and 'tis he only hath the key of his padlock. Priapus and Venus are well seated to∣gether. But that Jupiter should fall so heartily to the Souls, is not without reason, since some Philosophers have held, that all souls were reunited in the soul of the world, which they held to be Jupiter. But as the Gods live only on souls and idaa's so have I seen a Banquet of Poets, and their food was the vowels in a Verse which are cut off and not pronounc'd.

The drunkenness of the Gods is to be laid on their score, who have furnish'd them with all other vices.

The scuffle between the Pedees and the Pages about the wing of the soule of a Turkey, is to shew that those souls had the forms of bodies, and are dispers'd into all parts of the body to exercise their functions.

As for the Signs of Heaven, I quarrel not with their names, because I have no∣thing to say to the Astrologers, though they have not the images of those beasts by whose names they call them. But why should our Poets build their fables on them, and so fill Heaven with Adulteries and other crimes? Du Bartas and others, to take away the memory of those villanies, would needs change the fable into a sacred story, saying the Lyon belongs to Sampson, the Ship to Noa's Ark, Taurus to S. Luke, and Virgo and Via lactea to the Virgin Mary, &c. but they cannot carry out the humour.

There was no such way to abuse the odd personages which the Poets attribute to the Gods, as that of the latter band of Gods; and we must never more speak any otherwise then abusively of them all, as my Author does.

I know I have omitted divers things which deserve to be taken notice of: For there is not any passage in this Banquet which hath not a secret grace, besides that it contains the whole story of all the ancient fables, and that digested into a natural order. Lucian in his Dialogues may have somwhat of this humour, but he is im∣perfect;

Page [unnumbered]

and it was his design to deny the eternal Providence, which is not taken away with the loss of those names he quarrels with.

That's no less subtle attacque to the Fables, of Montenor's, as to the confusion of them. If Phaeton and his Father, as they say, fell into the River Eridan, why do they not tell us how they got out again? But there's no less inconvenience, if we say that that Torch of the Day is fastened to the Chariot of Phoebus; for Ovid says the Chariot was broke all to peeces.

That there is as much morality in ROBERT the Devil, as in the story of Hercules, is certain; for that was a sturdy fellow, and Mythologie hath a great latitude, for a wicked man may be made vertuous. If one man kill another, the meaning is, the victory of the wise man over the passions; and so of the rest.

Natalis Comes hath pester'd us with his Mythologies; and for his Genealogies of the Gods they are so various, that every one hath three or four fathers. Mr. Ross hath gone beyond him, and hath defil'd the Sacred history with the ordure and filth of Heathen fables.

Lysis's descriptions of Beauty, being by him spoken seriously, are an open abuse to the Poets, whose disciple he is. Nor is he less himself, where he proposes that every one should relate his story. And for his discourse with Charite, considering what he is, and what she is, it is very natural. What would a simple Country-Lass say, if a man said she had hurt him, but ask whether she had prick'd him, or scratch'd him? But Lysis had learn'd out of his Romances, that a Lover ought to speak al∣lusively to somwhat his Mistress had said.

Clarimond concludes with that saying; That to be happy, a man must be either King or Fool. Wherein he is in the right. Pleasure is not measur'd by the reality of things, but the imagination of them. There was a Serving-man, who would not live with any Master, but upon condition he might have one hour in the day to do what he pleas'd in his chamber. Having led this life a long time, his Master would needs know how he spent the time. Coming to his chamber-door, he perceiv'd through some chink, his man sate in a chair with a Crown on his head, having be∣fore him on the wall a draught of the Pope and Consistory; there did he make a speech for the Pope, and answer'd it in the name of the Emperor. But the Master discovering himself, the Fool folded up his Picture and went his ways, and was never seen since. Such a one is Lysis, who though he be not stark mad, yet conceives him∣self happier then an Emperor in his Pastoral and amorous imaginations. But he advances in his Extravagances, and finds my Author work for a

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.