Ciaconius, who suspects this to have been Justin's mistake, because about the place where he reports Simons Image to have been erected, there was, Anno Christi, 1574. the basis of a Marble Statue digged up, with this inscription, SIMONI SANCO DEO FIDIO: But to this answer it may be replyed, That though it be very certain that there were Pillars or Statues in Rome and Reatina bearing such like inscriptions [SEMONI SANCO FIDIO DEO: SANCTO SANCO SEMONI DEO FIDIO: SANCO FIDIO SEMO PATRI, (Ovid. Fast. 6.)
Quaerebam Nonas Sancto Fidióne referrem,
An tibi Semo pater: tunc mihi Sanctus ait,
Cuicunque ex istis dederis, ego munus habebo,
Nomina terna fero: sic valuêre Cures.
whom Vossius rationally concludeth to have been Hercules from the testimo∣ny of Varro, (lib. 4. de L. L.) and of Festus, [Herculi aut Sanco; qui sci∣licet idem est Deus.] Vossius de Idololatria, lib. 1. cap. 12. pag. 46, 47. Etiam inter indigites Deos Romanis fuit Semo Sanctus: qui & Fidius, quia per eum jurando fieret fides. Inscriptio Romana, SEMONI SANCO DEO FI∣DIO SACRUM; & alia, SANCTO SANCO SEMONI DEO FIDIO SACRUM: Yet the place assigned by Ovid agrees not to that, which Justin Martyr assignes to Simon Magus,
[Hunc igitur veteres donârunt aede Sabini,
Inque Quirinali constituêre Jugo.]
In whose Temple
Tanquill or
Caia Caecilia resided with her whorle and distaff, as out of
Varro Pliny reports,
(lib. 8. cap. 48.) Now, though
Justin might easily mistake
[Semoni] for
[Simoni] yet sure he must have had a beam in's eye if he took a Temple on the
Quirinal Hill for a Statue on
Ti∣bers Bridge. And that
Tertullian should follow him in that mistake, being so great an Antiquary, and which is more, by Profession a Lawyer, and therefore skill'd in the Roman Fasts and lect dayes, is still a greater wonder: And therefore notwithstanding
Vossius his Arguments to the contrary, I still think those great Lights of the Primitive Church did not ground their story of
Simon Magus upon such palpable mistakes. And as to
Ciaconius his rea∣son from the so late invention of that Statue dug up in or near the place where
Justin reports
Simons Statue to have been placed, I would think, That the Authority of
Justin and his writing this by way of Apology for the Christian Religion to the Emperour, within that Century wherein it was done; and
Tertulian's mentioning it in his Apology, (who was a man better skill'd in that Cities Antiquities than to be imposed upon in a thing of which he might have had ocular demonstration,) are enough to blunt the edge of this sword, if not to turn it against those that use it; and make men of sober minds ra∣ther suspect those diggers deceived, and that new-found basis to be a confir∣mation of
Justins History, That coming so near the Inscription of
Magus his Statue mentioned by him, and the difference betwixt that and this being, in all reason, imputable to the teeth of time, which corrodes the most durable Marble; against which, while the Characters could bear up themselves, they presented this Motto,
SIMONI SANCTO DEO FILIO: besides the canker of Age, a blow with a Mattock might sooner make an alteration in a Letter or two, in one Image besieged with Mattocks, than the Mothes conspire to gnaw out a piece of a Letter in three several Authors. I have ever dislik'd too much Criticisme in the consuring of approved Authors, as the Devils engine, insensibly, to screw men up to infidelity, and disbelief of the sacred Scripture it self, that being conveyed down to us in the same way of pen or press-tradition that other writings are. But to the Objection, from
Magus his Canonization, this will be answer sufficient; That whatever ho∣nour