Thesis 32.
Some thinke that those commandments onely are moral∣ly [ 32] good, which the Gospel hath declared and confirmed to be so: and by this shift they thinke to avoid the absurdity of flying to the blinde guide of corrupt nature to judge of these colours, viz. what is morall and what is not, Mr. Primrose therefore excludes the fourth Commandment from being morall, the other nine being ratified by the light of the Gospell, which this (he saith) is not: but if his mea∣ning be that there must be a generall ratification of lawes morall by the verdict of the Gospell, then the fourth Com∣mandment cannot be excluded from being morall, because it hath a ratification in generall from the Gospell: for therein wee read that the morall law is holy, just and good, Rom. 7. and that Christ came not to destroy the least jot or tittle of the law, Matth. 5. much lesse a whole law of the fourth Commandment. In the Gospel also God promi∣seth to write his Law upon our hearts, wherein the fourth Commandment is not excepted. But if his meaning be•• this, that the Gospell must particularly mention, and so make a particular ratification (as it were) by name of eve∣ry morall law, then his assertion is unsound; there being many judiciall lawes of Moses, of which some are wholly