Errour non-plust, or, Dr. Stillingfleet shown to be the man of no principles with an essay how discourses concerning Catholick grounds bear the highest evidence.

About this Item

Title
Errour non-plust, or, Dr. Stillingfleet shown to be the man of no principles with an essay how discourses concerning Catholick grounds bear the highest evidence.
Author
Sergeant, John, 1622-1707.
Publication
[S.l. :: s.n.],
1673.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699. -- Faith of Protestants reduced to principles.
Catholic Church -- Doctrines.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A59220.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Errour non-plust, or, Dr. Stillingfleet shown to be the man of no principles with an essay how discourses concerning Catholick grounds bear the highest evidence." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A59220.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 13, 2025.

Pages

Page [unnumbered]

INDEX.

ABsolute Certainty of Faith asserted. p. 21. 22. 50. 51.

Attributes of God not engaged to preserve pri∣vate Interpreters of Scripture from damna∣ble Errours. p. 81. to 85. Not to be ar∣gu'd from alone. p. 32. 33. much less from Power alone. p. 33. 34.

Certainty how abusively taken. p. 164. 165. 166. 168. 173. 174. 179. 180. True Cer∣tainty asserted and from its deepest Grounds explain'd. p. 167. 168. Moral Certainty in Faith discust, p. 176. 177. 178.

A Christian Life Spiritual. p. 8. 9. 54. 55. 191. to 195.

The Church turn'd with the heels upward by Dr. St. p. 96. 97.

His six Conclusions examin'd. p. 211. the na∣ture of Conclusions laid open. p. 222.

Faith in Catholicks Rational, p. 29.

Infallibility requisit to Faith. p. 92. to 96. 104. 158. 159. 162. how found in the vulgar, how in others p. 133. to 157. Mankind how Infal∣lible and in what. p. 186. to 189. Necessary to the being of a Church. p. 232. 233. 234.

Principles agreed to by both sides examin'd p. 7. 8. &c. shown to be two-fold p. 12.

Page [unnumbered]

Principles not agreed to, examin'd. The 1st p. 20. the 2d p. 22. the 3d. p. 23. the 4th p. 24. the 5th p. 26. the 6th p. 30. the 7th p. 31. the 8th p. 35. the 9th p. 38. the 10th p. 53. the 11th p. 72. the 12th p. 73. the 13th p. 81. the 14th p. 85. the 15th p. 90. the 16th p. 96. the 17th p. 104. the 18th p. 106. the 19th p. 114. the 20th p. 128. the 21th 22th 23th p. 130. the 24th p. 159. the 25th p. 163. the 26th p. 171. the 27th p. 173. the 28th p. 179. the 29th p. 181. the 30th p. 185.

Rule of Faith distinctly clear'd. p 44. 45. 49. 54. 55. &c. Vnanimously held by Catho∣licks. p. 45. 46. How held by the Council of Trent. p. 47. 48.

Scripture not the Rule p. 60. to 69. p. 79. 80. How perfect, p. 86. 87. &c. 109. to 113.

Sophistry in Dr. St. laid open p. 25. 26. 27. 28. 30. 31. 74. 75. 131. 132. 161. 164. 165. Igno∣rance in Divinity p. 191. 192. In Logick, p. 228. 236. 237. His Performances reduc't to their proper Principles, Contradictions. p. 236.

Tradition the Rule of Faith p. 45. 46. 141. 142.

Vnion how to be hoped. p. 51. 52.

Writing how capable to be the Rule of Faith. p. 36. 37. 38.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.