John Selden, Of the judicature in parliaments a posthumous treatise, wherein the controveries and precedents belonging to that title are methodically handled.

About this Item

Title
John Selden, Of the judicature in parliaments a posthumous treatise, wherein the controveries and precedents belonging to that title are methodically handled.
Author
Selden, John, 1584-1654.
Publication
London :: Printed for Joseph Lawson ...,
[1681?]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
England and Wales. -- Parliament. -- House of Lords -- Jurisdiction.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A59089.0001.001
Cite this Item
"John Selden, Of the judicature in parliaments a posthumous treatise, wherein the controveries and precedents belonging to that title are methodically handled." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A59089.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 19, 2025.

Pages

§ 2. In Judgment on Misdemeanors,* 1.1 the King's Assent is not required.

50 E. 3. The Lords judged divers Com∣moners for Misdemeanors, and the King's Assent not mentioned; as Richard Lyons, William Lord Latymer, a Privy Councel∣lor, John Lord Nevil, a Privy Councel∣lor, Jo. Peecher, and others. The King was then sick at his Mannor of Eltham, and on the last day of the Parliament, the Lords, Prelates and Commons came before him there, and he heard the Peti∣tioners, and their Answers for most part read, and also Judgment given on the Privy Councellors and others, dont ils se leyron franchement le respons de mesme nostre Seignior le Roy, Numb. 15. Which shews that the King had not assented to them.

Page 145

7 R. 2. The Bishop of Norwich was accused of Misdemeanors, and judged in 10 R. 2.

The Lord Chancellor Mich. de la Poole was judged by the Lords for Misdemea∣nors, and Speed fol. saith, That the King was much displeased thereat; for it appeareth he gave not his consent. And it was one of the Questions demanded of Tresilian and others, 11 R. 2. Whether the Judgment were erroneous, or not? and resolved to be erroneous; yet it was not objected against any the Lords Ap∣pellors that the Judges proceeded with∣out the King's Assent.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.