CHAP. X. Of Nimrod, Belus, and Ninus.
§. 1. NIMROD, the Sovereign after the Flood, was generally held a Tyrant: But Melan∣cton, and Onomasticum Theologicum judge otherwise. And it seemeth, that his leading this Troop to Shinar, was rather given him, than Usurped, seeing it is not Recorded that Noah, or any of the Sons of his Bo∣dy came with him, or were in that presumptuous Action. Some Ancients conceive Suphne and Ioctan were also Leaders; but joyned not in that unbeliev∣ing Attempt, and therefore lost not their Language.
§. 2. Nimrod, Belus and Ninus, were different Per∣sons, though Eusebius and Ierom confound the two first; and Augustine makes Belus King of Babylon, which Argueth him to be Nimrod. Mercator, with less probability confounds Nimrod and Ninus, out of Clemens. Diodorus Siculus Reports that Ninus sub∣dued Babylon, which perhaps had Rebelled upon set∣ling the Empire at Ninive, which was also in Shinar.
§. 3. Nimrod, not Assur, Built Ninive, as Iunius hath rendered Moses's Text agreeable to Reason and Sense, though Writers differ. That Assur Built it, greeth not with Moses's Order, who especially intend∣ing the Story of the Hebrews, first handleth the Birth of Noah's other Sons, beginning with Iaphet, proceed∣ing with Cham, and lastly with Shem, not interming∣ling one with the other, till he had set down a brief of all Three. In the Narration of Cham he makes a di∣stinct Discourse of Nimrod and his Brethren, being to speak after at large of Babels Confusion by it self,