The vvhipper vvhipt being a reply upon a scandalous pamphlet, called The whip, abusing that excellent work of Cornelius Burges, Dr in divinity, one of the Assembly of Divines, entituled, The fire of the sanctuary newly discovered / inserti authoris, Qui Mockat, Mockabitur.

About this Item

Title
The vvhipper vvhipt being a reply upon a scandalous pamphlet, called The whip, abusing that excellent work of Cornelius Burges, Dr in divinity, one of the Assembly of Divines, entituled, The fire of the sanctuary newly discovered / inserti authoris, Qui Mockat, Mockabitur.
Author
Quarles, Francis, 1592-1644.
Publication
[London] imprinted :: [s.n.],
M.DC.XLIV. [1644]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Burges, Cornelius, 1589?-1665. -- Fire of the sanctuarie newly uncovered.
Whip.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A56846.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The vvhipper vvhipt being a reply upon a scandalous pamphlet, called The whip, abusing that excellent work of Cornelius Burges, Dr in divinity, one of the Assembly of Divines, entituled, The fire of the sanctuary newly discovered / inserti authoris, Qui Mockat, Mockabitur." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A56846.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2025.

Pages

Cal.

Your Doctrine is good, had it been as well followed; Say Doctor, who was he, that a little before this Parliament (when our bre∣thren the Scots made their first approach into this kingdom, and whom a little after, the King Injuriously Proclaimed Rebels) in his Sermon at Magnes Church by London-bridge, flew in their faces, vilified them with opprobrious tearms, stiled their designe, Rebellion, proclaimed them Robbers, Ravishers, Traitors, and the disturbers of the Churches Peace, called their Doctrines schismati∣call, new fangled, and seditious, brought in to refine us, (with this addition) God will not be beholding to the Divel to sweep His Church; And not above a month after, at the beginning of thu Par∣liament in another Sermon at the same place, out of this Text Act.

Page 22

17. 30. (And the times of this Ignorance God winked at, but now commaneth all menevery where to repent) took an occasion to eate his words, & contradict every thing he formerly delivered? Who was the cowardly cur then? according to your own phrase pag. 138. line 3. Who is the Sheeps-heads now according to your own tearme? pag. 139. line 23. Who turned his Fiddle to the Base of the times? pag. 147. line 1. Who is guilty of Parasiticall basenes? pag. 147. line 18. Who is the Whiteliverd Christian to be turned out among dogs and hell-hounds? pag. 182. line 11. Doctor, now you have told us what he is, the whole parish of Magnes can tell you who it is. Who was it that was so active for the oath Ex Officio, so eager for the two shillings nine pence so contentious with his parishioners? The Clergy can witnesse the first, the City can te∣stisie the second, Magnes can attest the last: Yet all this was done by way of zeale.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.