Experimental philosophy, in three books containing new experiments microscopical, mercurial, magnetical : with some deductions, and probable hypotheses, raised from them, in avouchment and illustration of the now famous atomical hypothesis / by Henry Power ...

About this Item

Title
Experimental philosophy, in three books containing new experiments microscopical, mercurial, magnetical : with some deductions, and probable hypotheses, raised from them, in avouchment and illustration of the now famous atomical hypothesis / by Henry Power ...
Author
Power, Henry, 1623-1668.
Publication
London :: Printed by T. Roycroft, for John Martin and James Allestry ...,
1664.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Science -- Early works to 1800.
Physics -- Early works to 1800.
Microscopy -- Early works to 1800.
Microscopes -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A55584.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Experimental philosophy, in three books containing new experiments microscopical, mercurial, magnetical : with some deductions, and probable hypotheses, raised from them, in avouchment and illustration of the now famous atomical hypothesis / by Henry Power ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A55584.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed May 13, 2025.

Pages

CHAP. II.

That in the superiour part of the Tube there is no absolute Vacuity.

BEfore we proceed to any further Experiments, we will first canvass the Cause of this Primitive one of Torricellius, which has given occasion of trying all the rest; and then we wil deliver our Hypothesis, which I hope will salve all the strange appearances, not onely in this, but in those stranger that follow.

Valerianus Magnus, and some others are so fond to

Page 95

believe this deserted Cylinder to be an absolute Va∣cuity, which is not only non-philosophical, but very ridiculous.

1. For, the Space deserted hath both Longitude, Latitude, and Profundity, therefore a Body; for the very nature of a Body consists onely in extension, which is the essential and unseparable property of all Bodies whatsoever.

2. Again we have the sensible eviction of our own eyes to confute this Suppositional Vacuity; for we see the whole Space to be Luminous (as by Obser.) Now Light must either be a Substance, or else how should it subsist (if a bare Quality) in a Vacuity where there is nothing to support it?

3. Again, the Magnetical Efluxions of the Earth are diffused through that seeming Vacuity, as per Experi∣ment.

4. There is some Air also interspersed in that seem∣ing Vacuity, which cannot be expelled upon any in∣clination of the Tube whatsoever, as by Obser. is ma∣nifest.

5. The most full Evidence against this pretended Vacuity is from the returgenscency of the empty Blad∣der suspended in this Vacuity; for, how should it be so full blown from nothing? as is by Exp. most incompara∣bly evinced.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.