CHAP. IV.
SO king Solomon was king over all Israel a 1.1.
To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.
SO king Solomon was king over all Israel a 1.1.
2 And these were the princes which he had b 1.2, Azariah the son c 1.3 of Zadok d 1.4, ‖ 1.5 the priest e 1.6,
3 Elihoreph, and Ahiah the sons of Shisha, ‖ 1.7 scribes f 1.8: Jehoshaphat, the son of Ahilud the ‖ 1.9 recorder g 1.10.
4 And Benaiah the son of Jehoiada, was o∣ver the host: and Zadok and Abiathar were the priests h 1.11.
5 And Azariah the son of Nathan was over the officers i 1.12: and Zabud the son of Nathan k 1.13 was principal officer l 1.14, and the kings friend m 1.15.
6 And Abishar was over the houshold n 1.16: and * 1.17 Adoniram the son of Abda was over the ‖ 1.18 tri∣bute o 1.19.
7 ¶ And Solomon had twelve officers over all Israel, which provided victuals for the king and his houshold: each man his month in a year made provision.
8 And these are their names: ‖ 1.20 the son of Hur p 1.21 in mount Ephraim.
9 ‖ 1.22 The son of Dekar in Makaz, and in Shaal∣bim, and Bethshemesh, and Elon-Beth-hanan q 1.23.
10 ‖ 1.24 The son of Hesed in Aruboth, to him per∣tained Sochoh r 1.25, and all the land of Hepher s 1.26.
11 ‖ 1.27 The son of Abinadab in all the region of Dor s 1.28, which had Taphath the daughter of Solo-mon to wife.
12 Baana the son of Ahilud, to him pertained Taanach, and Megiddo, and all Beth-shean, which is by Zartanah beneath Jezreel t 1.29, from Beth-shean to Abel-Meholah, even unto the place that is beyond Jockneam.
13 ‖ 1.30 The son of Geber in Ramoth Gilead u 1.31, to him pertained the towns of Jair x 1.32 the son of Ma∣nasseh, which are in Gilead: to him also pertained the region of Argob, which is in Bashan, threescore great cities with walls and brazen bars y 1.33.
14 Ahinadab the son of Iddo had ‖ 1.34 Mahanaim z 1.35.
15 Ahimaaz was in Naphtali: he also took Bas∣math the daughter of Solomon to wife.
16 Baanah the son of Hushai was in Asher, and in Aloth.
17 Jehoshaphat the son of Paruah in Issachar.
18 Shimei the son of Elah a 1.36, in Benjamin.
19 Geber the son of Uri was in the countrey of Gilead b 1.37, in the countrey of Sihon king of the A∣morites, and of Og king of Bashan: and he was the onely officer which was in the land c 1.38.
20 ¶ Judah and Israel were many, as the sand which is by the sea in multitude, eating and drink∣ing, and making merry.
21 And Solomon reigned over all kingdoms, from the river d 1.39 unto the land of the Philistines e 1.40, and unto the border of Egypt f 1.41: they brought presents, and served Solomon g 1.42 all the days of his life.
22 ¶ And Solomons ‡ 1.43 provision for one day was thirty ‡ 1.44 measures h 1.45 of fine flour, and three score measures of meal i 1.46,
23 Ten fat oxen k 1.47, and twenty oxen out of the pastures l 1.48, and an hundred sheep, beside harts, and ro-bucks, and fallow▪ deer, and fatted fowl.
24 For he had dominion over all the region on this side the river, from Tiphsah m 1.49 even to Azzah, over all the kings on this side the river n 1.50: and he had peace on all sides round about him.
25 And Judah and Israel dwelt ‡ 1.51 safely, * 1.52 eve∣ry man under his vine, and under his fig-tree o 1.53, from Dan even to Beersheba, all the days of Solo∣mon.
26 ¶ And * 1.54 Solomon had forty thousand stalls of horses p 1.55 for his charets q 1.56, and twelve thousand horsemen r 1.57.
27 And those officers s 1.58 provided victual for king Solomon, and for all that came unto king Solo∣mons table, every man in his month: they lacked nothing s 1.59.
28 Barley also and straw for the horses, and ‖ 1.60 dromedaries t 1.61, brought they unto the place where the officers were, every man according to his charge.
29 ¶ And God gave Solomon wisdome, and understanding, exceeding much, and largeness of heart u 1.62, even as the sand that is on the sea shore x 1.63.
30 And Solomons wisdom excelled the wisdom of all the children of the east countrey y 1.64, and all the wisdom of Egypt z 1.65.
31 For he was wiser than all men a 1.66: than E∣than the Ezrahite, and Heman b 1.67, and Chalcol, and Darda c 1.68 the sons of Mahol d 1.69: and his fame was in all nations round about.
32 And he spake three thousand proverbs e 1.70: and his songs were a thousand and five f 1.71.
33 And he spake of trees g 1.72, from the cedar-tree that is in Lebanon, even unto the hyssop that springeth out of the wall h 1.73: he spake also of beasts, and of fowl, and of creeping things, and of fishes.
34 And there came of all people to hear the wisdome of Solomon, from all i 1.74 kings of the earth, which had heard of his wisdom.
This is spoken with respect to his Successors, who were Kings onely over a part, and that the smallest part of it. Or, in reference to the times of Division and Rebellion under David; when part went after David, and part after Ishbosheth; or part after Absalom, or Zeba, or Adoni∣jah: but now all Israel were united under Solomon, and ad∣hered to him, not onely a part of them; especially since the death of Adonijah and Ioab (who may be suspected to have watched an opportunity of revolting), and the con∣finement of Abiathar, and of Shimei (if not his death al∣so) who could now have little or no interest or opportunity of setting up a party against Solomon (their principals being taken away, to whom they were but accessaries); nor in pro∣bability, any design to attempt it.
i. e. The chief Rulers or Officers belonging to him.
Or, the Grand-son, by comparing this with 1 Chron. 6. 8, 9.
Ei∣ther Zadok the Priest, 1 Chron. 6. 8, 9. or some other of that name.
Or, the chief officer.
So he was the second Priest, or the Priest that attended upon Solomon's person in Holy Offices and Ad∣ministrations. But when this Sacred Writer professeth to give an account of Solomon's Princes, Why should he put the second Priest, or Solomon's Domestick Priest, in the first place? Or, why should he be mentioned distinctly from his Father, who was generally present with Solomon, and could easily, either by himself, or some other fit person or persons appointed by him, manage all the Kings Sacred con∣cerns? Or, why is he named before his Father? Others therefore render this Hebrew word, Prince, as it is used, Gen. 41. 45. and 47. 22, 26. Exod. 2. 16. 2 Sam. 8. 18. So he was either the chief in Dignity, the first Prince, and the highest Officer in the State next to the King: or the chief Minister of State, by whom the great Affairs of State were managed and prepared for the Kings consideration, &c.
Or, secreta∣ries.
i. e. Secretaries of State. He chose two, whereas Da∣vid had but one: either, because he observed some inconve∣niencies in trusting all those matters in one hand: or, be∣cause he had now much more employment than David had, this being a time of great Peace and Prosperity, and his Em∣pire enlarged, and his correspondencies with Foreign Princes more frequent.
Or, remem∣brancer.
Of which see on 2 Sam. 8. 16.
i. e. The High-Priests, to wit, successively, first Abia∣thar, and then Zadok. Quest. Why is Abiathar named when he was deposed? Ans. First, Because it is ordinary for per∣sons to retain the Names and Titles of those places which in reallity they have lost. Secondly, Because though he was deposed from the High-Priesthood, yet he was a Priest and the Chief of one of the Priestly Families: and as Zadok was joyntly named with Abiathar when Abiathar alone was the High-Priest, as 2 Sam. 8. 17. and 20. 25▪ so now Zadok and Abiathar are joyned, although the High-Priesthood was rested in Zadok alone. Thirdly, Possibly Abiathar, though he was deposed from the Supreme Priesthood, yet upon his serious repentance, and by the intercession of his Friends, was restored to the execution of the Priestly Office, and put into that place which Zadok enjoyed when Abiathar was High-Priest. Fourthly, Some say that here is mention made of all Solomon's Chief Officers, both such as now were, and such as had been, and such as were afterwards, as they gather from v. 11. and 15. where two persons are named who Married two of Solomon's Daughters, which could not be till many Years after this time.
Or, Overseers, or Surveyors, to wit, over those twelve Officers named ver. 7, &c. where this Hebrew word is used, who were all subject, and to give up their accounts to him. Though the word signifies any Governors or Commanders of the higher sort, as 1 King. 5. 16. 2 Chron. 8. 10.
The Prophet, who had been so highly instrumental in Solo∣mon's Establishment in the Throne.
Possibly, President of the Kings Council. The Hebrew word is Cohen, which ver. 2. is rendred Priest, whence some read this place thus: Zabud the son of Nathan the Priest, or the Minister (as the word properly signifies, and that Title well enough agrees to a Prophet, or the Prince: for the Prophet Nathan was a man considerable both for his quality, and for his honour and esteem with the King), was the kings friend.
Ei∣ther his special favourite, both for his Fathers sake and for his own, having, it seems, been brought up with him: or, his confident, with whom he used to communicate his most secret counsels
Steward of the Kings Houshold.
Chap. 5. 14.
Or, levy.
To wit, the per∣sonal Tribute, or the Levy of men, as appears by comparing this with chap. 5. 13, 14. it being very sit that there should be some one person to whom the chief conduct or inspecti∣on of that great business was committed.
Or, Ben-h•…•….
This and others of them are denominated from their Fathers, because they were known and famous in their ge∣neration.
Or, Ben∣deka•…•….
Or, Elon, the house or dwelling place of Hanan; and Hanan may be a mans name, and this place may be so differenced from other Elons. Or, the plain (for so the Hebrew word signifies) of Beth-hanan.
Or, Ben-he∣sed.
There were two Sochohs, but both near together. See Ios. 15. 35, 48.
In Iudah. See 1 Chron. 4. 6.
Or, Ben-a•…•…∣nadab.
In Manasseh within Iordan, where also were Tamach, Megiddo, and Bethshean, v. 12.
Which was in Issachar. And this seems added to di∣stinguish it from that Zartanah, Ios. 3. 16.
Or, Ben-〈◊〉〈◊〉.
Ramoth in the Land of Gilead, Deut. 4. 43. Ios. 20. 8. 1 King. 22. 3. so called to difference it from Ramoth in Issachar, 1 Chr. 6. 73.
In Manasseh beyond Iordan. See Numb. 32. 41. Deut. 3. 14.
This is added by way of distinction from those Towns of Iair. For being without Iordan, they were liable to the attempts of their Enemies.
Or, to •…•…∣naim.
The City and Territory of Mahanaim: of which see Gen. 32. 2. Ios. 13. 26. But this seems too narrow a com∣pass for one of these great Officers, and unequal to the rest: although these portions seem not to be distributed into equal portions of Land, but into larger or lesser parts, according to their fertility or barrenness. And this seems to have been a very fruitful place. See 2 Sam. 17. 27. Or, to Mahanaim. So he may understand all the space from the parts last mention∣ed to Mahanaim, which was in the Tribe of Gad.
Which he adds to distinguish him from that cursed and cursing Shimei, 2 Sam. 16. 5.
i. e. In the remaining part of that Land of Gilead, which was mentioned above, v. 19.
Or rather, in that land, for the Hebrew points intimate that the emphatical Article is there understood, to wit, in all Gilead, excepting the parcels mentioned before, in all the Territories of Sihon and Og; which because they were of large extent, and yet all com∣mitted to this one man, it is here noted concerning him as his priviledge above the rest, whose Jurisdictions were of a narrower extent.
Euphrates: for so far David, having conquered the Sy∣rians, extended his Empire, which Solomon also maintained in that extent. And so Gods promise concerning the giving of the whole Land, as far as Euphrates, to the Israelites, was fulfilled. And, if the Israelites had multiplied so much that the Land of Canaan would not suffice them, having Gods grant of all the Land as far as Euphrates, they might have seized upon it whensoever occasion required.
Which is to be understood inclusively; for it is unreasonable to think that the Philistines were not within Solomon's dominion.
Unto the River Sihor, which was the border between E∣gypt and Canaan, Ios. 13. 3. Compare Gen. 15. 18.
By Tribute, or other ways, as he needed and required.
•…•…eb. bread.
Heb. Cor•…•….
Heb. Cors: each of which contained ten Ephah's, Exod. 16. 36. So this Provision was sufficient for near three thou∣sand persons.
Of a courser sort for common use, and for the inferior sort.
Fatted in stalls.
Well fleshed, tender and good, though not so fa•…•… as the former.
Either that Tiphsah, 2 King. 15. 16. which was in the Kingdom of Israel within Iordan. Or, rather, another place of that name upon the river now mentioned, to wit, Eu∣•…•…ates, even that eminent City which is mentioned by Pto∣lemy, and Strabo, and Pliny, called Thapsarum. And this best agrees with the following Azzah, which was the border of Canaan in the South and West, Gen. 10. 19. Deut. 2. 23. as Tiphsab was in the North and East. And so his Dominion is described by both its borders.
Who owned subjection, and payed Tribute to him.
Heb. confi∣dently.
〈◊〉〈◊〉. 4. 4.
Enjoying the fruit of his own labours with safety and comfort. Under these two Trees, which were most used and cultivated by the Israelites, he understands all other Fruit∣bearing Trees, and all other comforts, by a Synecdoche. And they are brought in as sitting or dwelling under these Trees, partly for recreation or delight in the shade; and partly, for the comfort or advantage of the Fruit; and with∣al, to note their great security, not onely in their strong Ci∣ties, but even in the Country, where the Vines and Fig∣trees grew, which were most open to the incursions of their Enemies.
•…•… Chr. 9. 25.
In 2 Chron. 9. 25. it is but four thousand. Ans. First, Some acknowledge an error of the Transcriber, writing ar∣bal•…•…m, forty, for arbah, four, which was an easie mistake. And such mistakes in some Copies, in these lesser matters, God might permit, for the trial and exercise of our Faith, without any prejudice to the Authority of the Sacred Scri∣ptures in the great Doctrines of Faith and good life. Se∣condly, It is not exactly the same Hebrew word which is here and there, though we Translate both stalls; and there∣fore there may well be allowed some difference in the sig∣nification, the one signifying properly stables, of which there were 4000, the other stalls or partitions for each Horse, which were 40000. Which great number seems di∣rectly forbidden, Deut. 17. 16. except Solomon had some particular dispensation from God, which might be, though it be not Recorded.
Both for his Military Charets, which seem to be those 1400, 1 King. 10. 26. and for divers other uses, as about his great and various Buildings, and Mer∣chandises, and other occasions, which might require some thousands of other Charets.
Appointed partly for the defence and preservation of his People in peace; and partly, for attendance upon his Person, and for the Splendor of his Government. Compare chap. 10. 26. But the words may be otherwise rendred, and 12000 horses, for Parash mani∣festly signifies both an horse and horsemen. And these might be a better •…•…ort of Horses than most of those which were designed for the Charets. Or thus, and for (which Parti∣cle is easily understood and bortowed from the foregoing clause) 12000 horsemen: and so he means that the 40000 Horses were in part appointed for his Charets, and in part for his 12000 Horsemen.
Named above, v. 7, &c.
Or rather, they suffered no∣thing to be lacking to any man that came thither, but plen∣tifully provided all things necessary.
Or, m•…•…es, or, swift beasts.
Or, Mules, by comparing this with 2 Chron. 9. 24. or, Post-Horses: which are particularly mentioned and distin∣guished from the other Horses, because they took a more exact and particular care about them. Howsoever, it is a∣greed that these were swift Beasts, which is evident from Esth. 8. 10, 14. Mich. 1. 13.
i. e. Either, First, Magnanimity, or generosity and great∣ness of spirit, whereby he was disposed and emboldened to undertake great things. But this seems not so well to suit with the following resemblance. Or rather, Secondly, Vast∣ness of understanding, a most comprehensive knowledge of all things both Divine and humane: for this Wisdom is the thing for which he is here commended, both in the foregoing and following words.
Which cannot be numbred nor mea∣sured; and which, though it be so vast and comprehensive, yet consists of the smallest parts, and so it may note that Solomon's Wisdom was both vast, reaching to all things; and most accurate, searching and discerning every small thing.
The Caldaeans, Persians, and Arabians, who all lay East∣ward from Canaan, and who were famous in ancient times for their Wisdom and Learning, as appears both from Sa∣cred and Prophane Writers.
i. e. The Egyptians, whose Fame was then great for their Sk•…•…ll in the Arts and Sciences, which made them despise the Grecians as Children in know∣ledge. See Act. 7. 22.
Either of his Nation: or, of his time: or, of all times and Nations, whether of the East or any other Countrey, excepting onely the first and second Adam.
Israelites of eminent Wisdom, probably the same mentioned, 1 Chron. 2. 6. and 15. 19. and 25. 4. Psal. 88. title and 89. title.
Of whom see 1 Chron. 2. 6.
Obj. All these four were the Sons of Zerah, 1. Chron. 2. 6. or of Ezrah, as others call him. Ans. Either, the same Man had two names, Zerah and Mahol, which was common amongst the Iews; and he might be called Mahol from his office or employment; for that signifies a Dance, or a Pipe; and he was expert in Mu∣sical Instruments, and so were his Sons, 1 Chron. 15. 17, 18, 19. who possibly may here be called by a vulgar Ebraism•…•…, Sons of the Musical Instrument, from their dexterity in hand∣ling it, as upon another account we read of the daughters of musick, Eccles. 12. 4.
i. e. Short, and deep, and useful Sentences, whereof a great and the best part are contained in the Books of Pro∣verbs and Ecclesiastes.
Whereof the chief and most Di∣vine are in the Canticles.
i. e. Of all Plants, of their nature and qualities: all which Discourses are lost, without any impeachment of the perfection of the Holy Scriptures; which were not Inspired and Written to teach men Philosophy or Physick, but onely to make men Wise to Salvation. See Ioh. 20. 31. 2 Tim. 3. 16, 17.
i. e. From the greatest to the least.
To wit, from all the Neighbouring Kings; universal Particles being frequently understood in a restrained sense; and such restriction is grounded upon the following words, where this is limited to such as heard of Solomon's Wis∣dom.