Touching the Remnant of his Book.
HIs Self condemnation, and Contradiction. The Calvinists draw their own consequences from their Tenet of Decrees. How Mr. H. is their Accuser, and how his own. How as an Hobbist, and an Ar∣minian. How in striving to clear, he condemns himself; and confesseth his making God to be the Author of si•. His own thick darkness touch∣ing the darkness in the Creation. How he makes the most real thing• to be entia rationis. How he obtrudes a new Article of Faith. And makes it a point of omnipotence to be able to do evill. He proves his own sins to be positive entities, by ascribing his rage to his sobriety. His slanderous charge against Mr. Tho. Barlow of Q•eens C. in Oxford. His foul Defamation of Dr. Reynolds. His self contradiction, and blind zeal, as to Dr. Martin. The nullity of a Priesthood sinfully given by Presbyterians. The Recantations of some who were so Or∣dained. Mr. H's disappointment by Dr. Sandersons change of judg∣ment. A vindication of BP. Hall, BP. Morton, BP. Brownrig from Mr. H's slanderous suggestion. The perfect Amitie, and Communion of all Episcopal Divines, for all their difference in judgment as to some controverted Doctrines.
Mr. H's confession of his Ignorance, an Incapacity to understand the points in controversie. His confessed insufficiency to maintain the chief Articles of the Creed. Yet his conceitedness of his parts is not the less. His way to make a Rope of sand whereby to pull in the Puritanes. His sinfull way of defending Robbery by adding a mani∣fold aggravation. His slandero•s insinuation against the two houses of Parliament, to save the credit of the visitors in sinning against their own commission. His disparagement of the visitors in his e•deavours to assert them. The work he makes with Hypoc•ondriacal conceits.
