more imperfect and without an Epilogue. In the beginning of the third book of Oxen, Horses, Sheep, Goats, Dogs.
We'l sing of Goddess Pales, all's of him,
Who by Amphryso kept his sheep most trim.
At length in the beginning of the fourth book, there is the third transcition of the fourth part; but also imperfect from the only preposition of their Bees.
Now of their eyre honey Bee I'le speak.
So therefore the Poet studieth to place the most general first, the subalternate middle, the most special in the last place.
Q. Give another poetical example?
A. Ovid. in Fast. Useth this kinde of disposition, propo∣sing in the beginning the sum of his work.
I'le sing of times that pass throughout the year,
Fall of the stars, and rising I'le declare.
By and by having made imploration, he determineth the partition of the year made first by Romulus into ten months, which he reprehendeth.
When as Romes builder did the year divide,
In it he made five moneths, and five beside.
And a little after he adjoyneth Numa his more full devisor.
But Numa neither Janus did omit,
Nor yet the ancient shadows out did put:
But to th'old moneths two more appointed be.
Here the Poet having interpreted the common differences of Holy-dayes, Working-dayes, Banquet-days, Kalends, Nones, Ides; at the last he followeth every moneth in his place, and with a preface after this order he passeth from generals to the study of specials.
I th' what I have you shewed what things be,
It now remains, we part them presently.
At length after the exposition of every part, the transci∣tion is joyned as in the end of the first, and beginning of the second book.
The first part of my task is ended now,
The moneth is done my little book also:
Junus is done, another moneth beginneth?
Another book now with that moneth reneweth;
And in every one of his books after the transcitions are adhibited, but less accurately.
Q. How do the Orators follow this method?