Page 22
Chap. 2. Judiciary Astrology Arraigned and Convinc't by Philosophy, and the Professors proved altogether igno∣rant of Celestial Things. (Book 2)
CRave and learned Philosophers, to demon∣strate Astrological Divination, to be ridiculous and grounded upon no firm and solid basis or foundation, assert their Theses and Conclusions after this manner: Astro∣logers cannot certainly know, the vigour, power, defluxions, or effects of the Stars; nay, had they that knowledge which they have not, yet were it not sufficient, for a full and certain foretelling of things hereafter to be contingent; and there∣fore it follows by necessary consequence, and evi∣dently, that Astrological predictions are frivolous, vain, and fallacious. Two things are included in this argument, which are to be more at large elu∣cidated and explained, before further progress herein: The first is, that Astrologers are igno∣rant of Celestial things: The other, that although they were really and undeniably most expert and skilful, yet were not that sufficient, to divine in∣fallibly