Pages of his Reply, and I am well assured, if imparti∣al,
he will not think that I have in a Tittle wrong'd him,
p. 6, 7, 19, 21, 33, 35, 38, 39, 42, 46, 47, 48, 49, 55,
56, 65, 70, 72, 73, 89, 93. Of which I will only in∣stance
four.
1. First he affirms, that he quoted forty Places out of
our Friends Books, that would prove the Light within (as
within us) to be the only Lord, and Saviour, and very God,
p. 6. whereas he brought not any one that either pro∣ved
the Terms or the Matter.
2. Secondly, He confidently accused us, of charging
the Miscarriage of Mens Souls on the Knowledge the
Letter of the Scriptures by God's Blessing doth con∣vey,
p. 21.
3. Thirdly, Whereas I said that W. Smith's Words re∣flected
not in the least upon the Scriptures, nor those
Doctrines truly received thence; neither that any such
VVords can be produced by our Adversaries, he boldly
tells his Reader; I intended no other but that Smith doth
not accuse himself in so many Words of Blaspheming the
Spirit of God in the Scriptures, and the Doctrines from
thence received; as much as to say; We both knew it to
be Blasphemy, but W. Smith did not call it so, p. 41.
There is no ingenuous Man that will not abho•••• the False∣ness
of this Passage.
4. Lastly, I opposing his Affirmation, that we did
not profess or believe Eternal Rewards, thus pretends
to confute me: W. P. opposes me rather because he
would not be thought to subscribe to me, then that he be∣lieves
not what I say to be true, p 69. But if this be true
sure I am, there is no Truth in the World.
And indeed, there is no giving this Sort of Carriage