Page 39
OF THE Judge of Controversie.
I Shall explain what I mean by these Terms.
A Judge, is one that has not only Power 〈◊〉〈◊〉 determine, but Discerning to do it Rightly.
Controversie, is a Debate between two Parties about the Truth or Falshood of any ••roposition to be determined by that Judge.
From whence I am led to assert, that the Judge of Controversie must be certain and un∣••••ring.
And though this may seem strange to some, 'tis nevertheless true in it self: For if the Judge be fallible, he may indeed silence the Contending Parties by his Authority, but not the Controversie by a certain Judg∣ment, since he may as well determine Falsly as Truly. So that Controversie can never be rightly determined by a fallible Judge, there∣fore He is no true Judge of Controversie. Indeed it is absurd, and a Contradiction in it self to think otherwise; since he that is uncertain can never be certain of his De∣cision: And if not a certain one, then none to the Purpose. Nor ought any Person, no otherwise judged, that is persuaded of the Truth of his Cause, to let fall his Belief up∣on so Doubtful a Determination; since he moves not only without Conviction, but a∣gainst