A continuation of the exposition of the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews viz, on the sixth, seventh, eight, ninth, and tenth chapters : wherein together with the explication of the text and context, the priesthood of Christ ... are declared, explained and confirmed : as also, the pleas of the Jews for the continuance and perpetuity of their legal worship, with the doctrine of the principal writers of the Socinians about these things, are examined and disproved / by J. Owen ...

About this Item

Title
A continuation of the exposition of the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews viz, on the sixth, seventh, eight, ninth, and tenth chapters : wherein together with the explication of the text and context, the priesthood of Christ ... are declared, explained and confirmed : as also, the pleas of the Jews for the continuance and perpetuity of their legal worship, with the doctrine of the principal writers of the Socinians about these things, are examined and disproved / by J. Owen ...
Author
Owen, John, 1616-1683.
Publication
London :: Printed for Nathaniel Ponder ...,
1680.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Jesus Christ -- Priesthood.
Bible. -- N.T. -- Hebrews VI-X -- Commentaries.
Jews -- England.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A53678.0001.001
Cite this Item
"A continuation of the exposition of the Epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Hebrews viz, on the sixth, seventh, eight, ninth, and tenth chapters : wherein together with the explication of the text and context, the priesthood of Christ ... are declared, explained and confirmed : as also, the pleas of the Jews for the continuance and perpetuity of their legal worship, with the doctrine of the principal writers of the Socinians about these things, are examined and disproved / by J. Owen ..." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A53678.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 16, 2024.

Pages

VER. IX, X.

Which was a figure for the time then present, in which were offered both Gifts and Sacrifices, that could not make him that did the ser∣vice perfect, as pertaining to the Conscience, Which stood onely in meats and drinks, and divers washings, and carnal Ordinances impo∣sed until the time of Reformation.

I shall not alter the Translation, but shew what might be more properly ex∣pressed as unto some Instances in our Exposition.

Expositors have made use of various Conjectures in their Commentaries on this place. What is material in the most eminent of them, the Reader may see in Mr. Pool's Collections. But I must needs say, that in my judgment, they have brought more difficulty unto the Text, than they have freed it from. Wherefore I shall not detain the Reader in the examination of them; but I shall give that interpretation of the Text, which I hope will evidence its Truth unto such who impartially seek after it, and are in any measure acquaint∣ed with the things treated of.

Page 345

The Apostle in these two Verses gives a summary Account and Reason of the Imperfection of the Tabernacle, and all its Services, wherein the Admini∣stration of the Old Covenant did consist. This was direct and proper unto his present Argument. For his design is to prove the Preeminence of the New Covenant above the Old, from the excellency of the High Priest thereof, with his Tabernacle and Sacrifice. Unto this end a discovery of the imperfections and weakness of the first Tabernacle and Services, was indispensably necessary. And if notwithstanding its outward Excellency and Glory, it was no other but what it is here declared to be, as evidently it was not, then was it not only an unreasonable thing, and a plain rejection of the Wisdom and Grace of God, to adhere unto it in opposition unto the Gospel, which was done by the most of the Hebrews; but it was altogether unmeet and useless to be retained with the Profession of the Gospel, which the residue of them earnestly contended for. This was that which the Apostle designed ultimately to convince them of; and a work herein both great and difficult was committed unto him. For there is nothing more difficult, than to dispossess the minds of men of such Persuasions in Religion, as they have been bred up in, and received by a long Tract of Tradition from their Fathers. So we find it to be in such Persua∣sions and Observances, as are evidently false and impious unto the understand∣ings of all, that are not under the power of such Prejudices: So is it at present with them of the Roman Church, and others. But these Hebrews had a Pretence or Plea for their obstinacy herein, which none other ever had in the like case but themselves. For the things which they adhered unto, were confessedly of Divine Institution. Wherefore the Apostle labours principally to prove, that in the Will and Wisdom of God, they were to continue only for a season, and also that the season of their Expiration was now come. And this he doth in this place, by a declaration of their nature and use whil'st they did continue, whence it is evident, that God never designed them a perpetual station in the Church; and that because they could not effect what he pur∣posed and had promised to do for it. This is the substance of his present Ar∣gument.

There is in the words themselves,

  • 1. The Subject spoken of, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Which.
  • 2. The proper Use and End of it, It was a Figure.
  • 3. The limitation of that Use as unto Time, For the Time then present.
  • 4. The especial Nature of it, The offering of Gifts and Sacrifices.
  • 5. The Imperfection of it therein, They could not consummate the Worshippers in Conscience.
  • 6. The reason of that Imperfection, It stood only in Meats and Drinks, &c.
  • 7. The manner of its Establishment, It was imposed.
  • 8. The time alotted for its Continuance, Until the Time of Reformation.

1. The Subject spoken of is expressed by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Which. Some would re∣fer * 1.1 it unto 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 following; and so read the words, which figure was for the time present. But there is no cause for this Traduction of the words. The Verb Substantive 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is deficient, as usually, and is to be supplied as in our Translation, Which was; Which, that is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the Tabernacle. Not only the Fabrick and Structure of it, but the Tabernacle in both parts of it, with all its Furniture, Vessels, Utensils and Services, as before described.

2. As unto its proper Use and End, the Apostle affirms that it was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, * 1.2 Figura, Exemplar, Exemplum, Comparatio, Similitudo, Typus, Representatio: So variously is this word rendred by Interpreters. Most fix on Exemplar or Exemplum; but they are 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. And in all these Versions the proper sense of the word as used in the Scripture, is missed. It is not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 that the Apostle intends, but 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 as it is rendred by the Syriack.

Page 346

And this many have observed, namely, that it answers unto 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 but yet have missed in the interpretation of it. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is the same with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 wherewith it is joyned as of the same signification and importance. Psal. 49. 4. Psal. 78. 2. And whereas it is said that the Queen of Sheba tried the wis∣dom of Solomon 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 1 Kin. 10. 1. The Targum renders it by 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the Chaldee, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and the Syriack 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 being the same with the Hebrew 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. Now 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is anigma, problema, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉; a Riddle, an hard Question; and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is to speak anigmatically, obscurely, so as that one thing is to be ga∣thered out of another. So is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 used also. Ezek. 20. 49. is he not 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Proverbiator Proverbiorum; one that speaks darkly, and ob∣scurely; that expresseth one thing and intends another, using similitudes and Metaphors: An obscure mystical Instruction by figures, signs, symbols, meta∣phors and the like.

Thus is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 almost constantly used in the new Testament. So our Lord Jesus Christ expresly opposeth speaking in parables, unto a clear, plain, open teaching, so as to be understood of all. See Mat. 13. 10, 11, 12, 13. Ioh. 16. 28, 29. Now speakest thou openly, and no Parable. Wherefore 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in this place, is an obscure mystical Metaphorical Instruction. God taught the Church of old, the mysteries of our Redemption by Christ, by the Ta∣bernacle, its Fabrick, Parts, Utensils and Services: But it was but an obscure, parabolical, a figurative Instruction. So should the word here be rendred, a figurative Instruction, or the word Parable be here retained as it is in other plac∣es. This was Gods way of teaching the mysteries of his wisdom and grace; which as it was sufficient for the state of the Church which was then present; so it instructs us in what he requires, what he expects from us, unto whom all these things are unfolded, made plain and evident.

3. The third thing in the Text is the time or season wherein the Tabernacle was so parabolically or mystically instructive. It was 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 * 1.3 some few copies for 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 read 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 as doth that now before 〈…〉〈…〉 Vnto this present time. This reading is generally rejected by Expositors; as not suited unto the mind of the Apostle in this Place. For he intends not the time that was then present when he wrote the Epistle, not the times of the Gospel, not the time after the resurrection of Christ until the destruction of the Temple, which the addition of that word would denote: For God had prepared ano∣ther kind of Instruction for that season, and not by Parables, or mystical Me∣taphors. But yet the word may be retained, and a sense given of the words both sound and proper. For, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, may well signifie as much as until; or be taken 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 as it is often. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 unto this season; until the time that God would grant another kind of teaching, which now he hath done. It served until this present season wherein the Gospel is preached, and all the things signified by it are accomplished.

But I shall rather follow the reading of the most copies though the Vulgar Latine reading temporis instantis seems to favour the first. And Arias recti∣fying it into, in tempus praesens, gives the same sense also. But the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 being of the praeterimperfect tense, signifies a time that was then present, but is now past. And it is therefore well rendred by our Translators, the time then present; as if 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 had been in the Text. The time then present when the Tabernacle was made and erected. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 The season of the Church which was then present. For the Apostle in this whole discourse, not only respects the Tabernacle, and not the Temple, but he considers the first Erect∣ion of the Tabernacle in a peculiar manner: For then was it proposed as the means of the Administration of the first Covenant and the worship thereunto belonging. It is the Covenants which he principally designeth a comparison between. And he doth in that way of the disposition and administration of them, which was given and appointed at their first establishment. As this in the new Covenant was the Person, office, sacrifice, and ministry of Christ; so as unto the first, it was the Tabernacle and all the services of it.

Wherefore the time then present was the state and condition of the Church

Page 347

at the first setting up of the Tabernacle. Not as though this time was con∣fined unto that or those Ages wherein the Tabernacle was in use, before the building of the Temple. But this Instruction which was then signally given, was the whole of what God granted unto the Church, during that state where∣in it was obliged unto the Ordinances and services which were then instituted. The Instructions which God thought meet to grant unto the Church at that season were obscure, mystical and figuratively representative; yet was it suffici∣ent for the faith and obedience of the Church, had it been diligently attend∣ed unto, and what the Holy Ghost signified thereby. So are all Gods ways of Instruction in all seasons. We cannot erre but either by a neglect of enqui∣ry into them, or by looking for more than God in his wisdom hath committed unto them.

And this sense those who render 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 by a Figure, Type, or Example, must come unto: For the use of it is confined unto the time of the erection of the Tabernacle and the Institution of the ordinances thereunto belonging. But a Type or Figure was unto them of no use, but so far as it was instructive, which was obscurely and mystically. And that this is the sense of the word the Apostle declares, ver. 8. Where he shews the substance of what the Holy Ghost signified by the building, disposal, and services of the Tabernacle; that is, what he taught the Church thereby, parabolically and figuratively.

This kind of Instruction, whatever now it seem to us, was meet and fit for them unto whom it was given. And by the administration of Grace in it, it was a blessed means to ingenerate Faith, Love and Obedience in the hearts and lives of many unto an eminent degree. And we may consider from hence what is required of us unto whom the clear Revelation of the Wisdom, Grace, and Love of God are made known from the Bosome of the Father by the Son himself.

4. The especial nature and use of this Tabernacle and its service is declared. * 1.4 In which were offered both gifts and sacrifices. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the Vulgar Latine reads juxta quam; making the Relative to answer unto 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, or to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. But the Gender will not allow it in the Original. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is as much as 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in which time; during which season: For immediately upon the setting up of the Tabernacle, God gave unto Moses Laws and Institutions for all the Gifts and Sacrisices of the People, which were to be offered therein. This was the first direction which God gave after the setting up of the Tabernacle, name∣ly, the way and manner of offering all sorts of Gifts and Sacrifices unto him.

And the Apostle here distributes all the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 all the sacred offerings in∣to 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, that is, unbloody and bloody Sacrifices; as he did be∣fore, * 1.5 chap. 5. 10. where the distinction hath been explained.

Of them all he affirms, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, they are offered; not that they were so: * 1.6 For the Apostle erects a Scheme at the first Tabernacle and all its services at its first Institution, and presents it unto the consideration of the Hebrews, as if it were then first erected. He doth indeed sometimes speak of the Priests and Sacrifices as then in being, with respect unto that continuance of the Temple and its worship which it had in the Patience of God, as we have shewed on chap. 8. ver. 4. But here treating only of the Tabernacle and its worship, as that which was granted in the confirmation, and for the ad∣ministration of the old Covenant then entred into, as the Tabernacle, Priest∣hood and Sacrifice of Christ were given in the confirmation of the new; he represents that as present, which was past long before. The Tabernacle serv∣ed aptly for the use whereunto it was designed. It was meet for the offer∣ing of gifts and sacrifices. And so alone is the Tabernacle of Christ for its proper end also.

5. On these concessions the Apostle declares the imperfection of this whole order of things, and its impotency as unto the great end that might be expect∣ed from it; For these Gifts and Sacrifices could not make perfect him that did the service as pertaining unto the conscience. This was the end aimed at; this was represented in them and by them. And if they could not really effect it,

Page 348

they were weak and imperfect, and so not always to be continued. The end represented in and by them, was to make Atonement for Sin, that the Anger of God being pacified, they might have Peace with him. The Covenant was then newly established between God and the Church, be∣fore any Laws were given about these Offerings and Sacrifices, Exod. 24. God knew that there would be among the People, and even the Priests themselves many sins and transgressions against the Rules and Laws of that Covenant. This of it self it could not dispense withal. For its Sanction was the Curse against every one that continued not in all things written in the Book of it; wherefore if this Curse on all just and righteous occasions should rigidly have∣been put in execution, the Covenant would only have proved the means and cause of the utter destruction and excision of the whole People. For there is no man that liveth, and sinneth not. And on many occasions sin abounded in that state of the Church, wherein Light and Grace were but sparingly dispen∣sed, in comparison of the times of the New Covenant: Wherefore God in his Mercy and Patience provided, that by sacred Gifts and Offerings atonement should be made for sin, so as that the Curse of the Covenant should not be put in immediate execution against the sinner, Lev. 17. 11. But there were two things to be considered in those sins which God had appointed that atonement should be made for. The first was, the external temporal Punishment which was due unto them according unto the Place which the Law or Covenant had in the Politie or Commonwealth of Israel. The other, that eternal Punishment was due unto every sin by the Law, as the Rule of all Moral Obedience; For the wages of sin is death. In the first of these, the Person of the Sinner in all his outward circumstances, his Life, his Goods, his Liberty, and the like, were concerned. In the latter, here his Conscience, or the inward man alone was so. And as unto the first of them, the Gifts and Sacrifices mentioned being rightly offered, were able in themselves ex opere operato, to free the Sinner from all temporal political inconvenience or detriment, so as that his Life and In∣heritance should be continued in the Land of Canaan, or his state preserved entire in the Commonwealth of Israel. This the Apostle here tacitely acknow∣ledgeth, namely, that the Gifts and Sacrifices were able to free the Sinner from temporal Punishment, and give him outward Peace in his Possessions. But as unto the latter, wherein Conscience was concerned, he denies that they had any such efficacy.

They were not able, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. It agrees in Gender with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 only, and not with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, which being of the Neuter Gender, usually regulates the con∣struction * 1.7 in such conjunctions. But as most think it equally respects both the antecedent Substantives. And instances may be given where a Participle re∣specting more antecedent Substantives than one, may agree in Gender with either of them. As Leges & Plebiscita coactae. But I rather think that the Apostle confines the Impotency he mentions unto Sacrifices only; that is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, slain and bloody Sacrifices. For these things which were 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Gifts and no more, were not designed to make Atonement for Sin; that was to be done by Blood, and no otherwise, so the words should be read; offered Gifts and Sacrifices that could not persect.

These Sacrifices were impotent and ineffectual unto this end, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. What the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which the Apostle so frequently mentions in this Epistle, I have * 1.8 before declared, and so what it is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. It is indeed to persect, to consum∣mate, to sanctifie, to dedicate, to consecrate. But whereas these Sacrifices did all these things outwardly, and as unto the flesh, as the Apostle grants, ver. 7. he doth not here absolutely deny it unto them, but in a certain respect only.

They could not do it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, as unto the Conscience of the Sinner before God. What he intends hereby, he doth more fully declare, Chap. 10. ver. 2. * 1.9 There is a Conscience condemning for sin. This could not be taken away by these Sacrifices. They were not able to do it; for if they could have done so, the sin∣ner would have had compleat Peace with God, and would not have had need to have offered these Sacrifices any more: But they were multiplied and often re∣peated, because of their disability unto this end; wherefore 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉,

Page 349

is to give Peace of Conscience unto men, through a sense of perfect Atone∣ment made for sin, in the sight of God, with an interest in his love and favor thereon. This it is to be persect or consummate, as pertaining to Conscience in the sight of God, namely, to have a Conscience condemning for sin taken away. This those Sacrifices of the Law could not effect. It will be said then, Unto what end did they serve? Were they of no use but only to free men from the Penalties of the Law or Covenant, as it was a Rule of the Politie or Com∣monwealth of Israel, and the Tenure of their Possessions in Canaan? Yes, they were moreover part of the 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, or mystical instruction which God grant∣ed the Church in those days, directing them unto the one Sacrifice and Offer∣ing of Christ, typically representing it, and through Faith applying the vertue and efficacy of it unto their Consciences every day.

6. The Person is described towards whom this effect of purifying the Con∣science * 1.10 is denied. They could not thus perfect 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Him that did the Service, saith our Translation, I think not so properly. He that did the Service was the Priest only. But respect is had unto every one that brought his Gift or Offering unto the Altar. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, sacredly to accom∣plish the Services was the work of the Priest alone, ver. 6. But 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, is the same with 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Chap. 10. 1. that is, every one who brought his Sacrifice to be offered, that Atonement might be made for him. And 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 comprehends the whole of Divine Worship in all Individuals. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Mat. 4. 10. But he also may be said to do the Service, on whose account and in whose stead it was performed.

But the Defect charged, doth not in the first place reflect on the Persons, as though it was by their default. They worshiped God according unto his own Institutions, but it was in the Sacrifices themselves. And if they could not make the Worshipers, those who did the Service, perfect, they could make none so, for it was they alone who had the benefit of them.

The Note of Grotius on this place is, Isti cultus non possunt Sectatorum suo∣rum animos purgare à vitiis quemadmodum Evangelium; most remote from the mind of the Holy Ghost. For he speaks not of purging our minds from Vices, but of purifying Conscience by Atonement made for the guilt of sin; and op∣poseth not those Sacrifices unto the Doctrine of the Gospel, but unto the Sa∣crifice of Christ. And we may hence observe,

1. There is a state of perfect Peace with God to be attained under imperfect Obedience. For it is charged as a weakness in the legal Administrations, that they could not give such a Peace, where any sin remained. It is therefore to be found in the Sacrifice of Christ, as is proved at large in the next Chapter. Being justified by Faith, we have peace with God.

2. Nothing can give perfect peace of Conscience with God, but what can make Atonement for sin. And whoever attempt it any other way but by vertue of that Atonement, will never attain it in this world nor hereafter.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.