LEt us looke downe to the Idiome and language of the Fathers, and compare their Sayings to∣gether, and wee shall finde these Testimonies no lesse vehemently, than violently and uncon∣scionably objected.1 1.1 Hierome is alleged, as calling Christ both Feast and Guest, (namely) by giving this Sacrament to be Eaten of others, and Eating it himselfe: [ 20] which you (for proofe of his Corporall Presence in the Eu∣charist) Interpret to be Properly understood. But wee say not Properly, but Figuratively and Vnproperly, even as well as are his words following, where hee nameth our Drinking Christs Blood, the Pressing out, with the feet, the elect and cho∣sen Vines: as also, in calling the Church of Christ, the Kingdome of the Father. Might not these his latter Improper Phrases of Speech have beene cleare Spectales unto you, to Diserne the like Impropriety in the former? The same Answer may be given to the like objected speech of Chry∣sostome, [ 30] concerning Christs2 1.2 Eating himselfe, which is, toge∣ther with the former, to be Discussed in the next Section following.
In the Second place, the Eucharist is called in the Greeke 3 1.3 Liturgies, and in the Councell of* 1.4 Nice, the Viati∣cum, that is Viand, or Provision for our Travell in our way to Life everlasting. A word objected by your4 1.5 Aquinas and others, which notwithstanding can prove no more for your (properly) Corporall Receiving the Eucharist, than it can for receiving the same Corporally in Baptisme, which is cal∣led [ 40] by5 1.6 Basil and6 1.7 Gregorie Naxianzene our Viaticum. (See the7 1.8 Margin.)