Page 229
[ 10] THis Proposition accordeth to the judgement of ancient Fa∣thers, shewing thaty 1.1 God cannot doe something, even be∣cause he is Omnipotent, as not dye, not sinne, not lye, because such Acts proceed not from power, but from impotencie, and infirmitie.
{fleur-de-lys} Theophylact will explaine this Point, in answering this Question, Can God make that which is once done to have beene not done?1 1.2 God is true of his words (saith hee) but to make that not to be done, which hath beene done, is a Lie. How then can hee that is true, Lie? He should sooner lose his Divine na∣ture. They therefore that speake so, talke as if they should aske [ 20] whether God can be God, whence their question appeareth to bee ridiculous. So he. The ancient Father Iustine* 1.3 distin∣guisheth of Impossibilities; One, simple and absolute, which hee calleth 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and the other, which hee saith is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉: giving for his example, in the first Impossi∣bility, a Diameter-line in a Figure to bee equall unto the sides thereof. Of the further judgement of the Fathers hereaf∣ter. {fleur-de-lys} So the Fathers.
It is not long since you have beene taught by an exceeding worthy Scholler, that in such Cases as imply Contradiction [ 30] the ancient Fathers noted the pretence of Gods omnipotencie to have beene ancientlyz 1.4 The Sanctuary of Heretikes. And they give an instance in the Arians, who denying Christ to have beene God eternall, beleeved him to have beene created God in time; as if it were possible there should be a made God, whose property is to be eternall. Their only pretence was Gods Om∣nipotencie, to make false things true: wherein they proved [ 40] themselves the greatest Lyars. Take unto you a second Pro∣position.