VVEe answere that your ownef 1.1 Castro will not allow your Antecedent, but is perswaded rather (by the manifest Current of the Text) that The Apostles were not Priests when the Cup was given unto them. And although they were then Priests, yet we answere, that your Consequence, (viz.) Ergò onely Priests are enjoyned to receive the Cup, will appeare to be both fond in it selfe, and to your owne selves pernicious. First, as fond, as if one should argue thus: It was at the first said only to the Apostles, Goe and baptize all Nations: Ergò none but the [ 30] Apostles have Command to Baptize, which office you permit aswell to women Laicke, as to men. Next pernicious, for say (Wee pray you) doe the words, [Drinke yee all of this] com∣mand all Priests to drinke? then must this condemne the con∣trary * 1.2 Practice of your now Church of Rome, which allow∣eth the Cup to no Priest present, but onely to him that doth Conse∣crate: which is directly confuted by the Example of Christ, who administred the Cup, unto all his Apostles, by your do∣ctrine, Priests.
[ 40] Againe, Do these words onely command the Priest to re∣ceive the Cup? then likewise do you condemne your former Church of Rome, which hath sometime permitted the Cup unto Laike. Yea, and your Cardinall Alang 1.3 doth not sticke to tell