The Lords Supper or, A vindication of the sacrament of the blessed body and blood of Christ according to its primitive institution. In eight books; discovering the superstitious, sacrilegious, and idolatrous abomination of the Romish Master. Together with the consequent obstinacies, overtures of perjuries, and the heresies discernable in the defenders thereof. By Thomas Morton B.D. Bp. of Duresme.

BOOKE III.

• OF the first Romish Consequence, arising from the depraved sense of Christs words, which is called TRANS-SVESTANTIATION. pag. 145.

Chap. I.

• Conversion, held by Protestants, is Sacramentall; but that which is defended by the Romanists is Trans∣substantiall, &c. pag. 146. tho∣row-out.

Chap. II.

• Romish Transsubstantiation not ab∣solutely proved by Scripture it selfe, as is Confessed. p. 147. It is an Inno∣vation both in Name, and in the Ar∣ticle it selfe. pag. 151, &c.

Chap. III.

• Romish maner of Transsubstantia∣tion, whether by Adduction or Pro∣duction, both confuted by Romish Do∣ctors, as Absurd. pag. 153, &c.
• {fleur-de-lys}The Testimonies of two Popes contradicting one another about Formall Transsubstantiation. p. 155. And a Confutation of both maners of Conversion, by their owne prin∣ciples. pag. 156. With a Vindi∣cation against a late Calumniator, concerning the ancient Saxons faith, in the Doctrine of the Eucharist. pag. 158, &c. And a Confirmation thereof from Christs speech, pag. 163. And of Pope Innocent the third. pag. 164. And from other Testimonies of Antiquity. pag. 169, 170. (The Iesuite Mallounes In∣stance in Ioane Martlesse her nose, for her admirable faculty of smel∣ling. pag. 873.) And from the existence of some new Accidents after Consecration. pag. 176. Fur∣ther adding, to the Testimonies of Antiquity, that of Tertullian. p. 178. and an Objected Testimony of Pope Clement. pag. 179. and, out of Athanasius, what 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is. pag. 182. Together with the Testimo∣ny of Euphraimius Bishop of An∣tioch. pag. pag. 187.{fleur-de-lys}

Chap. IV.

• The Vnconscionablenesse of Romish Doctors, in Objecting, for Trans∣substantiation, the Fathers (there) calling it a Change by Omnipoten∣tie. pag. 188.
• {fleur-de-lys}The Testimony of Hilarie. pag. 191 And a Vindication of Cy∣prian's Saying [Christs Body is crea∣ted herein.] p. 192. and of another of his [Infusing Divine essence.] pag. 193, &c.{fleur-de-lys}
• Their further Vnconscionablenesse, in alleging the Fathers as denying it to be Common Bread. pag. 194, &c. Their forbidding us to judge it by Sense. pag. 195, &c.
• {fleur-de-lys}The Iudgement of Master Isaac Casaubon, concerning Saint Cyril. pag. 197, 198.{fleur-de-lys}
• Their other Objections out of other Fathers anew. pag. 198, & 201, &c.
• {fleur-de-lys}Two Testimonies of Gregory Nyssen, pag. 203. And of Cyrill the moderne Patriarch of Constan∣tinople,

• against Transubstantiation. pag. 205. With Master Isaac Ca∣saubon his Iudgement, concerning the Doctrine of Antiquity for this point. pag. 209, &c.{fleur-de-lys}