Enthusiasmus triumphatus, or, A discourse of the nature, causes, kinds, and cure, of enthusiasme; written by Philophilus Parresiastes, and prefixed to Alazonomastix his observations and reply: whereunto is added a letter of his to a private friend, wherein certain passages in his reply are vindicated, and severall matters relating to enthusiasme more fully cleared.

About this Item

Title
Enthusiasmus triumphatus, or, A discourse of the nature, causes, kinds, and cure, of enthusiasme; written by Philophilus Parresiastes, and prefixed to Alazonomastix his observations and reply: whereunto is added a letter of his to a private friend, wherein certain passages in his reply are vindicated, and severall matters relating to enthusiasme more fully cleared.
Author
More, Henry, 1614-1687.
Publication
London, :: Printed by J. Flesher, and are to be sold by W. Morden bookseller in Cambridge,
MDCLVI. [1656]
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Vaughan, Thomas, 1622-1666. -- Anima magica abscondita -- Early works to 1800.
Vaughan, Thomas, 1622-1666. -- Anthroposophia theomagica -- Early works to 1800.
Vaughan, Thomas, 1622-1666. -- Man-mouse taken in a trap -- Early works to 1800.
Ecstasy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A51300.0001.001
Cite this Item
"Enthusiasmus triumphatus, or, A discourse of the nature, causes, kinds, and cure, of enthusiasme; written by Philophilus Parresiastes, and prefixed to Alazonomastix his observations and reply: whereunto is added a letter of his to a private friend, wherein certain passages in his reply are vindicated, and severall matters relating to enthusiasme more fully cleared." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A51300.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed November 10, 2024.

Pages

Observation 4. Pag. 5.

Here in the third place you cavil at Aristotles De∣finition of the Soul, and by your slubbering and bar∣barous translating of the term 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 smother the fitnesse of the sense. What more significant of the na∣ture of a Soul, then what this term 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 is com∣pounded of? viz. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.

—Totamque infsa per artus Mens agitat molem.
Or if we read the word as Cicero, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, it wil be more significant, as being made up of 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 and 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. And that which do's inwardly pervade and pe∣netrate, that which do's hold together, and yet move this way and that way, and lastly still moving possess and command an organical body, &c. what is this but a Soul, or what better Definition can be given of it then this? But here this peremptory opposer do's still inculcate the same cavil, that the naked substance or essence of the soul, is not set out by this, but its operations. But still out of the same ignorance, suppo∣sing that a substantial Form can be better known then by its proper operations. And this ignorance of his makes him so proud, that he does Fellow at every word, if not Sirrah, Prince Aristotle; because he has not done that which is impossible to doe, unbare to us the very substance of the Form. What an imperious boy is this! a wrangling child in Philosophy, that

Page 109

screams and cries after what is impossible, as much as peevish babes, after what is hurtful. Aud in this hu∣morous straining and wrigling bemarres both his Mo∣ther and his Aunt, both the Universities at once, cast∣ing dirt and filth upon their education of youth, as if they taught nothing, because they cannot teach what is impossible to be learned.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.