A brief reply to a late answer to Dr. Henry More his Antidote against idolatry Shewing that there is nothing in the said answer that does any ways weaken his proofs of idolatry against the Church of Rome, and therefore all are bound to take heed how they enter into, or continue in the communion of that church as they tender their own salvation.
More, Henry, 1614-1687.

Vpon the seventh Paragraph.

Which I do more-flly inculcate in the begin∣ning of the last part of this seventh Paragraph. And Page  219 in the first and second part thereof copiously de∣monstrate, that though these Images have the simi∣litude of Signification onely, as he loves to call it, and not of Figure, yet it is Idolatry over and over again to Worship them. Which Hypothesis he chiefly or rather onely adheres to, and has sport∣ed and playd away his time in superfluously and weakly trifling against the first part of my Dilemma, is if he would make good the similitude of Figure betwixt the Images and Prototypes when he seems to believe neither any truth nor necessity of it: but onely to make a show of confuting this seventh Chapter, when he has left the latter end of the sixth Paragraph, and this whole seventh untouch∣ed, which is the main drift of all; namely to shew, that whether the Images have any similitude with their Prototypes or no, yet it is Idolatry to Wor∣ship them, and that therefore the Council of Trent has no subterfuge in this regard to excuse them∣selves from the charge of Idolatry, in appointing the honour they appoint to them.