The works of the pious and profoundly-learned Joseph Mede, B.D., sometime fellow of Christ's Colledge in Cambridge

About this Item

Title
The works of the pious and profoundly-learned Joseph Mede, B.D., sometime fellow of Christ's Colledge in Cambridge
Author
Mede, Joseph, 1586-1638.
Publication
London :: Printed by Roger Norton for Richard Royston ...,
1672.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Mede, Joseph, 1586-1638.
Theology -- Early works to 1800.
Theology -- History -- 17th century.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A50522.0001.001
Cite this Item
"The works of the pious and profoundly-learned Joseph Mede, B.D., sometime fellow of Christ's Colledge in Cambridge." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A50522.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed April 26, 2025.

Pages

1 COR. 11. 5.
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. Every woman praying or prophesying with her head uncovered, dishonoureth her head.

I HAVE chosen this of the woman, rather than that of the man going before it, for the Theme of my Discourse; First, Because I conceive the Fault, at the reformation whereof the Apostle here aimeth, in the Church of Corinth, was the womens only, not the mens. That which the Apostle speaks of a man pray∣ing or prophesying, being by way of supposition, and for illustra∣tion of the unseemliness of that guise which the women used. Secondly, Because the condition of the Sex in the words read, makes something for the better understanding of that which is spoken of both; as we shall see presently.

The Discourse I intend to make upon the Text shall consist of these two parts. First, of an Enquiry, What is here meant by Prophesying, a thing attributed to wo∣men, and therefore undoubtedly some such thing as they were capable of. Secondly, What was this Fault, for matter and manner, of the women of the Church of Corinth, which the Apostle here reproveth.

[unspec I] To begin with the First, and which I am like to dwell longest upon: Some take Prophesying here, in the stricter sense, to be foretelling of things to come, as that which in those Primitive times both men and women did, by the pouring out of the Holy Ghost upon them;* 1.1 according to that of the Prophet Ioel, applied by S. Peter to the sending of the Holy Ghost at the first promulgation of the Gospel, I will pour out my Spirit upon all flesh, and your sons and daughters shall prophesie, and your young men shall see visions. And that such Prophetesses as these were those four Daughters of Philip the Evangelist, whereof we read Acts 21. 9.

Others take Prophesying here in a more large notion, namely, for the gift of inter∣preting and opening Divine mysteries contained in Holy Scripture, for the instruction and edification of the Hearers; especially, as it was then inspired and suggested in extraordinary manner by the Holy Spirit, as Prophecy was given of old; according to that of S. Peter, Prophecy came not in old time by the will of man, but holy men of God spake as they were moved by the Holy Ghost.* 1.2 So because many in the beginning of the Gospel were guided by a like instinct in the interpretation and application of Scrip∣ture, they were said to Prophesie. Thus the Apostle useth it in the fourteenth Chap∣ter of this Epistle, where he discourses of spiritual Gifts, and before all prefers that of Prophecy;* 1.3 because he that Prophesieth (saith he) speaketh unto men to edification, and exhortation, and comfort.

But neither of these kinds of Prophecy sutes with the person in my Text, which is a woman. For it is certain the Apostle speaks here of Prophesying in the Church or Con∣gregation; but in the Church a woman might not speak, no not so much as ask a que∣stion for her better instruction, much less teach and instruct others, and those men. This the Apostle teacheth us in this very Epistle, Chapter the fourteenth, even there where he discourseth so largely of those kinds of Prophecy.* 1.4 Let your women (saith he) keep silence in the Churches: For it is not permitted unto them to speak, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, but to be subject. And if they will learn, let them ask their husbands at home. Again in 1 Tim. 2. 11, 12. Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.

Note here, that to speak in a Church-Assembly, by way of teaching or instructing others, is an act of superiority, which therefore a woman might not do; because her sex was to be in subjection, and so to appear before God in garb and posture which consisted therewith; that is, she might not speak to instruct men in the Church, but to God she might.

Page 59

To avoid this difficulty, some would have the word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, in my Text, to be taken passively, namely, for to hear or be present at Prophecy,* 1.5 which is an accepti∣on without example either in Scripture or any where else. It is true, the Congre∣gation is said to pray, when the Priest only speaks; but that they should be said to preach, who are present only at the hearing of a Sermon, is a Trope without exam∣ple. For the reason is not alike: In prayer the Priest is the mouth of the Congrega∣tion, and does what he does in their names, and they assent to it by saying Amen. But he that preaches or prophesies, is not the mouth of the Church, to speak ought in their names, that so they might be said to speak too; but he is the mouth of God speaking to them. It is not likely therefore that those who only hear another speaking or pro∣phesying to them, should be said 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 to prophesy; no more, as I said, than that all they should be said to preach, who were at the hearing of a Sermon.

What shall we do then? Is there any other acception of the word [Prophesying] left us, which may sit our turn? Yes, there is a Fourth acception, which, if it can be made good, will sute our Text better (I think) than any of the former; to wit, that Prophesying here should be taken for praising God in Hymns and Psalms: For so it is fitly coupled with praying; Praying and Praising being the parts of the Christian Liturgie. Besides, our Apostle also in the fourteenth Chapter of this Epistle joyns them both together;* 1.6 I will pray (saith he) with the spirit, and will pray with under∣standing also: I will sing with the spirit, and I will sing, that is, prophesie, with under∣standing also. For, because Prophets of old did Three things: first, foretel things to come; secondly, notifie the will of God unto the People; and thirdly, utter themselves in Musical wise, and, as I may so speak, in a Poetical strain and composure: hence it comes to pass that to prophesie in Scripture signifies the doing of any of these Three things, and amongst the rest, to praise God in Verse or Musical composure.

This to be so as I say, I shall prove unto you out of two places of Scripture: and first out of the first of Chronicles, Chap. 25. where the word Prophesie is three several times thus used. I will alledge the words of the Text at large, because I cannot well abbreviate them. Thus therefore it speaks; Vers. 1. Moreover, David and the Cap∣tains of the Host separated to the service of the sons of Asaph, and of Heman, and of Ie∣duthun, who should prophesie with Harps, with Psalteries, and with Cymbals: and the number of the men of Office, according to their service, was, 2. Of the sons of Asaph; Zaccur, and Ioseph, and Nethaniah, and Asarelah, the sons of Asaph, under the hands of Asaph, which prophesied according the order of the King. 3. Of Ieduthun; the sons of Ieduthun, Gedaliah, and Zeri, and Ieshaiah, Hashabiah, and Mattithiah (and Schimei) six, under the hands of their father Ieduthun, who prophesied with a Harp, to give thanks and to praise the Lord. Lo here, to prophesie, and to give thanks (or confess) and to praise the Lord with spiritual songs, made all one.* 1.7 Nor needs such a Notion seem strange, when as even among the Latins the word Vaes signifieth both him that foretels things to come, and a Poet; for that the Gentiles Oracles were given like∣wise in Verse: And S. Paul to Titus calls the Cretian Poet, Epimenides, a Prophet; as one, saith he, of their own Prophets said,* 1.8

〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉

And the Arabians (whose language comes the nearest both in words and notions to the Hebrew) call a chief Poet of theirs (Princeps omnium Poetarum (saith Erpenius) quos unquam vidit mundus) Muttenabbi, that is, Prophetizans, or the Prophet 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.

Now then if Asaph, Ieduthun and Heman prophesied, when they praised God in such Psalms as are entituled unto their several Quires, and as we find them in the Psalm-Book; (for know that all the Psalms entituled To the sons of Korah, belonged to the Quire of Heman who descended from Korah) why may not we, when we sing the same Psalms, be said to prophesie likewise? namely, As he that useth a prayer com∣posed by another, prayeth; and that according to the spirit of him that composed it: so he that praiseth God with these spiritual and prophetical composures, may be said to prophesie according to that spirit which speaketh in them.

And that Almighty God is well pleased with such Service as this, may appear by that one story of King Iehoshaphat, in the second of Chronicles, who when he march∣ed forth against that great confederate Army of the children of Ammon, Moab,* 1.9 and mount Seir, the Text tells us, that having consulted with his people, he appointed Singers unto the Lord, that should praise the Beauty of holiness, as they went out before the Army; and to say, Praise the Lord, for his mercy endureth for ever; (that is, they should sing the one hundred and sixth Psalm, or one hundred and thirty sixth Psalm, which begin

Page 60

in this manner, and were both of them not unfit for such an occasion.) And when they began to sing and praise, (saith the Text) the Lord set ambushments against the children of Ammon,* 1.10 Moab, and Mount Seir, which were come against Iudah; and they were smitten.

A second place where such kind of Prophets and Prophesying as we speak of are mentioned,* 1.11 is that in the first of Samuel, in the story of Saul's election, where we read, that when he came to a certain place called The Hill of God, he met a company of Prophets coming down from the Highplace, (or Oratory there.) with a Psaltery, and a Tabret, and a Pipe, and a Harp before them; and they prophesied, and he with them.

Their Instruments argue what kind of Prophecy this was, namely, Praising of God with spiritual songs and melody: In what manner, is not so easie to define or specifie; but with an extemporary rapture, I easily believe. And if we may conjecture by other examples, One of them should seem to have been the Praecentor, and to utter the Verse or Ditty; the rest to have answered 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the extremes or last words of the Verse: For after this manner we are told by Philo Iudaeus, that the Esseni (who were of the Iewish Nation) were wont to sing their Hymns in their 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 or worshipping-places. And after the self-same manner, Eusebius tells us, did the Primitive Christians; having in all likelihood learnt it from the Iews whose manner it was. The same is witnessed by the Author Constitutionum Aposiolicarum, in his second Book and fifty seventh Chapter, where describing the manner of the Christian Service, after the reading of the Lessons of the Old Testament, (saith he) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉* 1.12 Let another sing the Psalms of David, and the people succinere, or answer. 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, (i. e.) 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, the extremes of the verses. Some footsteps of which Custom remain still with us, (though perhaps in somewhat a different way,) when in those short Versicles of Liturgie, being Sentences taken out of the Psalms, the Priest sayes or sings the first half, and the People answer the latter, quasi, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.* 1.13 As for ex∣ample, in that taken out of Psalm 51. 15. the Priest sayes, O Lord, open thou our lips; the People or Chorus answers, And our mouth shall shew forth thy praise. But whatsoever the ancient manner of answering was, thus much we are sure of, That the Iews in their Divine Lauds were wont to praise God after this manner, in Antiphons or Re∣sponsories; as (to let pass other Testimonies, and the use of their Synagogues to this day derived from their Ancestors) we may learn by two special Arguments. One from the Seraphims singing, Esay 6. 3. where it is said that the Seraphims cryed one unto another, saying, Holy, Holy, Holy Lord God of Hosts, the whole Earth is full of his Glory. Note, They cried one unto another. Secondly, from the use of the Hebrew verb 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 which in the proper and native signification thereof being to answer, is also used for to sing: as in Psalm 147. 7. where we translate, Sing unto the Lord with thanksgiving, sing praise upon the Harp unto our God; in the Hebrew it is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉. Answer unto the Lord in thanksgiving, sing praise upon the Harp unto our God. And Esay 27. 2. In that day sing ye unto her, a vineyard of red wine: in the Hebrew, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Answer ye unto her. And Numbers 21. 17. in Israel's song of the Well, Spring up, O Well, sing unto it: in the Hebrew it is, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 Answer unto it. And Moses speaking of those that were worshipping the golden Calf, Exodus 32. 18. It is not the voice of them that shout for mastery, nor the voice of them that cry for being overcome; but the noise of them that sing do I hear: In the Hebrew, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 the voice of them that answer one another. And so in other places. But to put all out of doubt, look Ezra 3. 11. where it is ex∣presly said, The Levites, the sons of Asaph, sung together by course, in praising and giv∣ing thanks unto the Lord, Because he is good, for his mercy endureth for ever. Hence was derived the manner of Praying and Praising God in the Christian Service, alter∣nis, in a Musical way, and, as it were, by way of prophesying and versifying; even though we do but speak it only; as you know the Poet sayes,—Amant alterna Ca∣men••••. Thus I have taken occasion somewhat to enlarge upon this particular; that we our selves might the better understand the reason of what we do, and what pre∣cedents and whose example we follow therein. And thus much of Prophesying.

I COME now to the Second thing I propounded to speak of; namely, What was that Fault among the Corinthians which the Apostle here taxeth. For the right understanding whereof, I say two things. First, For the Offenders, that they were the women, and not the men: That which the Apostle speaketh concerning men, being by way of supposition only, and to illustrate his Argument against the uncomely guise of the women, à pari. This appears, because his Conclusion speaks of women only, and nothing at all of men. Secondly, For the quality of the Fault, it was this;

Page 61

That the women at the time of praying and prophesying were unveiled in the Church; notwithstanding it was then accounted an unseemly and immodest guise for women to appear open and bare-faced in publick. How then, will you say, should it come to pass that Christian women should so much forget themselves, as to transgress this Decorum in God's House and Service, which they observed otherwhere? I answer, From a phantastical imitation of the manner of the She-Priests and Prophetesses of the Gentiles, when they served their Idols; as their Pythiae, Bacchae or Maenades, and the like; who used, when they uttered their Oracles, or celebrated rites and sacrifices to their Gods, to put themselves into a wild and extatical guise, having their faces discovered, their hair disshevelled and hanging about their ears. This these Corin∣thian women (conceiting themselves when they prayed or prophesied in the Church, to be acting the parts of She-Priests, uttering Oracles like the Pythiae or Sibyllae, or cele∣brating sacrifice as the Maenades or Bacchae) were so fond as to imitate (as that sex is prone to follow the fashion) and accordingly cast off their veils, and discovered their faces immodestly in the congregation, and thereby (as the Apostle speaks) dishonoured their heads, that is, were unseemly accoutred and dressed on their head.

Which he proveth by three Arguments. Partly from Nature, which having given women their Hair for a covering, taught them to be covered, as a Sign of subjection; the manner of this covering being to be measured by the custome of the Nation. Partly by an Argument à pari, from men; for whom, even themselves being Iudges, it would be an uncomely thing to wear a veil, that is, a womans habit: so, by the like reason, was it as uncomely and absurd for a woman to be without a veil, that is, in the guise and dress of a man. And howsoever the Devils of the Gentiles some∣times took pleasure in uncomeliness and absurd garbs and gestures; yet the God whom they worshipped, and his holy Angels who were present at their devotions, loved a comely accomodation, agreeable to Nature and Custome, in such as wor∣shipped him. For this cause therefore (saith he* 1.14) ought a woman to have a covering on her Head, because of the Angels. Lastly, he concludes it from the Example and Custome both of the Iewish and Christian Churches; neither of which had any such use, for their women to be unveiled in their sacred assemblies: If any man (saith he* 1.15) be contentious, (that is, will not be satisfied with these reasons) let him know that we (that is we of the Circumcision) have no such custome, nor the Churches of God. For so, with S. Ambrose, Anselme, and some of the Ancients, I take the meaning of the Apostle to be in those words.

Thus you have heard briefly, What was the Fault of these Corinthian Dames, which the Apostle here taxeth. From which we our selves may learn thus much, That God requires a decent and comely accommodation in his House in the act of his worship and service: For if in their habit and dress, surely much more in their gestures and deportment, he loves nothing that is unseemly in the one or in the other: Which I doubt some of us, at least of the younger sort, are not so observant of in this place as we should; and therefore with those whom it concerns would amend it. And thus I conclude my Discourse.

Notes

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.