Page 450
THE SECOND BOOK. (Book 2)
CHAP. I.
What arms were most used by the Ancients in their Wars.
WHen you have raised your men, the next thing is to furnish them with Arms, and before you do that, I think it not amiss to examine what Arms were most used by the Ancients, and choose the best. The Romans divided their Infantry into those who were compleatly, and those who were slightly armed. Those who were lightly armed, were called Velites, under which name all were comprehended who car∣ried Bows, and Slings, and Darts; the greatest part of them had Casques upon their heads for their defence, and a kind of Buckler upon their arm. They fought in no order, and at distance from those who were arm'd compleatly; Their Arms consisted of a Head-piece or Morrion which came down to the Shoulders, a Brigandine down to their knees, their legs and arms were covered with Greeves, and Gauntlets, a Buckler covered with Iron, about two yards long, and one broad, an Iron ring about it without to keep off the blows, and another within to keep it from the dirt when it was lay'd upon the ground. Their offensive Weapons were a Sword at their left thigh, about a yard and half long, with a Dagger on their right side. They carried a Dart in their hand which they called Pilum, which upon a a Charge they darted at the Enemy.
These were the Arms with which the Romans conquered the whole world. And though some of their ancient Writers do give them a Spear in form of a Spit; I do not see how such a Weapon could be handled by one that carried such a Buckler, for it was too heavy to be managed with one hand; besides (unless it were in the Front where they had room to make use of them) it was impossible to use them in their ranks; for the nature of Battels is such (as I shall show hereafter) that they do always contract and keep close, as being in much less danger, than when they are drawn up looser and at a distance: So that in that close order, all Arms that are above two yards long, are not to be used, for having a Spear that is to be managed with both hands, if your Buckler were no hinderance, it could not hurt your Enemy when he was near. If you take it in one hand, and manage your Buckler with the other, you must take it in the middle, and then there will be so much of it be∣hind, that they who come after you will hinder you from handling it: So that it is true, either the Romans had no such Hastae, or if they had, they made but little use of them. For if you read the History of Titus Livius, in the description of all his Battels, you will scarce ever find he mentions those Hastae, but tells you all along that having dar••ed their Pila, they fell to the Sword. My opinion therefore is, that this Hasta be lay'd aside, and that in imitation of the Romans we make use of their Sword and Buckler, and other Arms, without troubling our selves with that.
The Grecians for their defence did not arm so heavily as the Romans but for offence, they relyed more upon the Spear, than the Sword, especially the Macedonian Phalanx, who carried of those Javelins which they called Sarissae, with which they brake the Enemies Battels, and kept their own firm and entire. And though some Writers say that they also had their Bucklers, (yet I know not (for the reasons abovesaid) how they could consist. Besides, in the Battel betwixt Paulus Emilius and Perseus King of Macedon, I do not remem∣ber that any mention was made of any-Bucklers, but only of their Sarissae, and yet the Romans had much ado to overcome them. So that my opinion is, the Macedonian Pha∣lanx was just such a Body as the Swizzers Battalion; whose whole force lyes in their 〈◊〉〈◊〉. The Romans were likewise accustomed to adorn their Soldiers with Plumes of Fea∣thers in their Caps, which renders an Army beautiful to their Friends, and terrible to their