CHAP. VI.
BEllarmine himself (de Euchar. l. 1. c. 5.) tells us, that many Papists (as Biel, Cusanus, Cajetane, Tapper, Hessels, Jansenius) deny, that our Saviour in this Chapter treates of the Sacrament. And for those which hold otherwise, they are divided also, (as Ferus sheweth on this Chapter) Some of them will have that which our Saviour here speaketh about the bread of life to be meant of the Eucharist, others will not have the Eucharist to be spoken of here till verse 51. and thus holdeth Bellarmine, and à La∣pide. But first, this Sermon was uttered by our Saviour (as Bishop Vsher saith) above a yeare before the celebration of his last Supper,* 1.1 wherein the Sacrament of his body and bloud was instituted, at which time none of his hearers could possibly have understood him to have spoken of the externall eating of him in the Sacrament. For in verse 4. this fell out not long before the Passeover, and consequently a yeare at least before the the last Passeover, wherein our Saviour instituted the Sacrament of his Supper, See John 11.55. Secondly, The eating which Christ speakes of here is by faith, even the very act of faith, ver. 29, 35, 48, 47. therefore it is spirituall eating, not sacramentall, which may be without faith. Thirdly,* 1.2 If those words ver. 53. be meant of the Eu∣charist, then how can our adversaries defend their Communion under one kind, seeing here the drinking of Christs bloud is required, as without which there is no life, this is argumentum ad hominem, a forcible reason against the Papists, and it prevailes with divers of them to interpret this Chapter not of the Eucharist.
The eating of the flesh of Christ, and the drinking of his bloud, spoken of in this Chapter, is not the eating of the Sacrament of the Supper, but all manner of participa∣tion with Christ in the word and Sacrament. This eating here spoken of necessarily giveth life everlasting to the eater, 27, 35, 51, 54. but the Sacrament doth not so. 2. This eating of Christ is perpetuall, and that without which no man can have life in him,* 1.3 ver. 53. But the eating of the Sacrament is not perpetuall, nor that without which a man cannot have life in him.
Vers. 9. There is a lad here] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, a little Lad, puerulus.
Two small fishes] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, two small fishes. Small they must needs be, as the word in the originall signifies, otherwise how could the little boy have tugged them thither? The multiplying is thought to have been first in the hands of our Saviour (as Augustine notes with St Hierome.) then to have continued under the hands of the Apostles (as Chrysostome) and lastly to have its complement in the hands and mouths of the eaters,* 1.4 as St. Ambrosa concludes with St. Hilary.
Vers. 12. Gather up the fragments] That is, forget not the least benefits.* 1.5