An entire body of philosophy according to the principles of the famous Renate Des Cartes in three books, (I) the institution ... (II) the history of nature ... (III) a dissertation of the want of sense and knowledge in brute animals ... / written originally in Latin by the learned Anthony Le Grand ; now carefully translated from the last corrections, alterations, and large additions of the author, never yet published ... by Richard Blome.

About this Item

Title
An entire body of philosophy according to the principles of the famous Renate Des Cartes in three books, (I) the institution ... (II) the history of nature ... (III) a dissertation of the want of sense and knowledge in brute animals ... / written originally in Latin by the learned Anthony Le Grand ; now carefully translated from the last corrections, alterations, and large additions of the author, never yet published ... by Richard Blome.
Author
Le Grand, Antoine, d. 1699.
Publication
London :: Printed by Samuel Roycroft, and sold by the undertaker Richard Blome [and 10 others],
1694.
Rights/Permissions

To the extent possible under law, the Text Creation Partnership has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to this keyboarded and encoded edition of the work described above, according to the terms of the CC0 1.0 Public Domain Dedication (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/). This waiver does not extend to any page images or other supplementary files associated with this work, which may be protected by copyright or other license restrictions. Please go to http://www.textcreationpartnership.org/ for more information.

Subject terms
Descartes, René, 1596-1650.
Philosophy -- Early works to 1800.
Link to this Item
http://name.umdl.umich.edu/A50014.0001.001
Cite this Item
"An entire body of philosophy according to the principles of the famous Renate Des Cartes in three books, (I) the institution ... (II) the history of nature ... (III) a dissertation of the want of sense and knowledge in brute animals ... / written originally in Latin by the learned Anthony Le Grand ; now carefully translated from the last corrections, alterations, and large additions of the author, never yet published ... by Richard Blome." In the digital collection Early English Books Online. https://name.umdl.umich.edu/A50014.0001.001. University of Michigan Library Digital Collections. Accessed June 15, 2024.

Pages

CHAP. II. Of Taste.

I. Why the same sort of Meat is not always alike grate∣ful to us. THE same sort of Meat doth not always please. For that which is gratefully receiv'd by the Hungry Stomach, becomes unpleasant and unsavoury to the same Stomach well satisfied; and the same Drink which delights the Thirsty, be∣comes loathsom to those that are fill'd with Drink.

The Reason is, because all Savoury Things im∣press an affection in the Organ of Taste, accord∣ing to the Contexture and disposition wherewith it is imbued: So the Tongue over-dry, or void of Moisture, perceives little or no taste in any thing; and so on the contrary, a Tongue which is turgid or swelling with too much Moisture, and hath its pores stopt up with liquid Bodies, cannot be affect∣ed with any Savour. Since therefore the dispositi∣on of the Tongue, in a person fasting, and in a Person full, is quite different; hence it comes to pass, that the same sort of Meat or Drink is not always in the same manner received in its little chinks and small pores, and consequently induces a different affection therein. This may possibly arise from a Mutation of Temperament, whilst the Spittle, proceeding from the Stomach, according to the qualities of the Humour wherewith the Stomach is repleated, mingles it self with the particles of the Meat in the Mouth, and promotes their acting.

II. The Gross Error of the Peripa∣teticks about Sa∣vors. This very Experiment alone is sufficient plainly to discover how grosly the Peripateticks are de∣ceived when they affirm, that the savor in savo∣ry Bodies does every way agree with the senti∣ment we have thereof. Since were it according to their opinion, it would follow, that the same Man could not at several times have a different taste of the same sort of Meat, which is contrary to experience.

It may also happen, that from the various situa∣tion of the Nerves conducing to Taste, all sense of Taste may be taken away, according to the mention made by REALDUS COLUM∣BUS, of one Lazarus, vulgarly Sirnamed the Glass-devourer, who not distinguishing in any thing bitter from sweet, fresh from salt, used to devour Stones, Glass, Charcoals, Fish drawn alive out of a Fish-pond. Of which Monster of Nature, when after his death, a Dissection was appointed by a Person of Curiosity inquisitive into the Cause of so uncouth a thing: It was found that the sixth Conjugation of the Nerves, which was ordained by Nature, for Tastes sake in other Men, in this Glass-devourer reached neither to the Palate, nor

Page 205

to the Tongue, but turned back to the hinder part of the Head.

IV. They that are troubl'd with the Jaundise, think all things they taste to be bitter. They that are troubled with the Jaundise, think all sorts of Meat they taste to be bitter, and im∣bued with a quality noxious to them.

This mistake proceeds from the Choler which is diffused through the Tongue, for such a sort of hu∣mour, mingled with the Spittle, infects the Meats, and imbues and depraves the Organ of Taste with its bitterness: So that these lterick Persons are not so much deceived about the Affection imprest (for they do really taste that which is bitter, and the Organ is certainly ill affected) as about its Cause, since they look upon the said Savor as received from the Meat, when as indeed it is to be impu∣ted to the humour only. For some without any Meat, seem to themselves to taste a certain Sa∣vor, in regard this humour sliding into the Tongue or Jaws, vitiates and corrupts their Temperament. The same thing happens in the Touch, as when any one fancies he feels the force of heat, and thinks Fire to be applied to his Body, when in∣deed Fire is far enough off from it, and only a de∣fluent humour, either a tension of parts alone, or a tumor with it impresses such an affection, as Flame the Instrument of Pain, were it present, would impress.

V. How it is that the Tongue dis∣covers any disease. The Tongue is the chief Indicator of any Dis∣ease, and by whatsoever Infirmity we are opprest, 'tis thither we have recourse for all the Signs and Discoveries thereof. In so much, that it hath been always the custom of all Physitians, the first thing they do, to bid the Patient hold out his Tongue.

The Reason is, because the Tongue being the tenderest of all parts of the Body, is most easily wrought upon; for since it is of a Spongeous Na∣ture, and abounding with Blood, it is soon seiz'd with the force of a Disease, or infected by vitia∣ted Blood, by both which being ill-affected, no wonder if it soon discover the alterations of the Body, and reveal with what infirmities it is assault∣ed; sometimes it looks Red, sometimes Yellow; and when its plexure is singular, it is subject only to a singular affection.

VI. They that eat Bread in a Morn∣ing, have a vellica∣tion at the root of the Tongue. They that take a Crust of Bread with a draught of Wine, for Breakfast, seem in a manner to feel certain prickles in the innermost recess of the Tongue.

Because the Meal of which the Bread is made, is for the most part kneaded with Ferment and Salt, the latter whereof still imparts something of Acrimony: For the parts immingled are rendred more sharp, than those that are more solute and loose, and adhere to it with a lesser tie. Whence New Bread pleases more, and is more grateful to the Organ of Taste, in regard the particles there∣of being less interwoven, are better chewed by the Spittle, and more gently move and affect the in∣nermost tract of the Palate.

VII. Why it is that those who have no savor of Meats, seem also not to have any smell. They that have not the faculty of perceiving Savors, must in all likelihood be deprived also of the sense of Smelling, as is many times observed in a Distemper called the Pose, where the sense of Smelling being taken away, that of Taste also fails.

The Cause of this Consequence depends upon the Corpuscles which are inservient to both Senses; forasmuch as they are the same, and differ in no∣thing but their various Expansion. For the sense of Smelling proceeds from particles of Emanations flying in the Air, which being mixt with the Air we breathe, are conveyed to the Nose. But the particles which conduce to Taste are indeed less subtile, and are to be imbibed by some humour, that they may smite the Organ of the Tongue; yet they are really the same, and are only distin∣guish'd in this, viz. that being diluted with hu∣mour, they cause Savor, and being exhaled and transmitted through the Air, they cause Odour.

VIII. When Nau∣seation comes, or a vomiting up of cer¦tain Meats. Many who have an aversion to certain sorts of Meats; for example, to Old Cheese, or the like, when they happen to taste of the same unawares, certainly contract a great loathing, and immedi∣ately, if possibly, vomit it up; but if they cannot, presently fall sick, or find themselves very much indisposed.

The Reason is no other than that the said Meats, either by their Odor or Vapor inflict damage upon those Fibrels or pores of the Nerves: For while they ill affect the Nerves inserted into the Ventri∣cle, they first cause a tremour of the Lips or Nau∣seation; and if the said Vellication of the Nerves continue, there will at length follow a Vomiting, which Nauseation ever precedes; nor is the said Nausea any thing else than the tremulous Motion of the innermost Membran investing the Mouth, which proceeds even from the vellication of the Ventricle, as to which Tunicles, that of the Mouth is continuous.

IX. Why upon defect of Taste, defect of Smell should fol∣low. It may also be otherwise said, that the privati∣on of Taste induces the failure of another Sense, viz. Smell; by reason that both Sensories being planted near each other, are apt to be both toge∣ther overwhelmed and glutted by the same serous matter squeesed out of the Blood: In as much as the tubulated Membrans of the Nostrils, and the structure of the Tongue it self consist of a very rare, and as it were spongious composure: Where∣fore the pores of either Organ, and the passages from the Serous floating matter are apt to be over∣flowed, and the sensile Fibres in both at the same time to be obstructed; to which may be added, that whereas the Nostrils and Tongue ought to b supplied with a continual moisture; both of them as they most grievously, and more than other parts, undergo a deflux of superabundant Serum, so both are equally obnoxious to the same mischief upon any slight cause.

X. Why sick Persons have an aversion to Meats that are sweet. Sick Persons, and those that are of a Crasie Bo∣dy, reject all sweet things, and are only delighted with what is acid and sharp.

The Reason why these sickly people have such an aversion to all Meats that are sweet, is because of the vitiated Blood, and the malignant quality of the Morbifick Humour, which being for the most part Choler, breaks into the Tongue, as being a very tender place, and causes innumerable ob∣structions, hindring a just perception of the Meats that are presented. Hence it is that sharp Meats please the Sick, in regard the Tongue is covered with a certain Uliginous tegument, so that sweet things cannot enter and pass through it; whereas Acids affect in another manner, as consisting of long and inflexible parts. Nor is it for any other cause that Beasts covet Salt, and are very much taken with the eating thereof, because their Tongue is scabrous and rough, and overlaid with a certain Crust.

Page 206

XI. Sweet Meats hin∣der others from being relish'd. Who ever hath a relish of sweet things, hath not a right relish of other Meats of a more accu∣rate taste.

Because all Esculent or Eatable Things are no otherwise tasted, but so far as the Tongue induces and insinuates within the pores certain Savoury Corpuscles reduced and made small by manduca∣tion or Chewing. But whereas sweet things are viscous or clammy, and for the most part obstruct the passages of the Tongue, they hinder the su∣pervenient savoury particles from being carried into, and affecting the Sensorium. Wherefore the better to restore again the faculty of Tasting, we use to feed upon sharp or salt things, to the end that they may loosen the passages of the Tongue, and wear away, and take off the inherent Viscosities.

XII. How it is hat Spittle is excited at the sight of things grateful to the Paa e. Spittle at the sight of things grateful, and with which we are chiefly delighted, increases and fills the Mouth.

This happens by reason those sorts of Meat, which before are apprehended to be grateful to us, now again excite an Appetite in the Soul to receive them: Whence it comes to pass, that the Soul being intent upon this alone, sends more co∣pious Spirits into the Glandules of the Mouth, so that they being so much the more compressed, the Spittle at the sight of those grateful appearances is squeesed out in greater abundance.

Do you have questions about this content? Need to report a problem? Please contact us.