Page 1
The First Part OF THE HISTORY OF NATURE. OF BODIES. (Book 1)
CHAP. I. Of a Body Extended.
I. The Exi∣stence of Bodies is evident to our Senses. THO' our Senses are often mistaken, and being deluded by false Repre∣sentations, do circumvent our Mind; yet have we no safer way by which we may arrive to the Knowledge of Corporeal things, than when with their assistance we measure their Dimensions, and by Signs conveyed through our Eyes, discover their Existence: For it is by their Advertisements we come to know, that Matter consists of 3 Dimensions; and that the Parts of it are capable of various motions, have different Forms, and do diversly affect the Organs of our Senses. For tho', it may be, what is pre∣sented to our Eye, be only such in outward Ap∣pearance, and be represented to us quite other∣wise than indeed it is; yet must not we therefore suppose it to be no more than a Phantasm, or some vanishing Appearance, and such as is not to be ranked in the Catalogue of Things; seeing it is necessary that something that is Bodily, must lye hid under that shell or outward Appearance, and which really is the basis and foundation of the Figure we see; tho' because of its distance, or for other Reasons, it may not be perceived such as indeed it is, but takes to it self another Appear∣ance, that it may arrive at the Organs of our Senses.
II. The Senses are not deceived, as to the Matter or Subject of things. There is no question, but that he to whom a Square Tower, viewed at a distance, appears to be Round, hath something that is Material or Sub¦stantial conveyed unto his Organ; since it is im∣possible that either a Square or Round Figure should be seen, without any thing to support it, or that might be the Subject of it; it being a plain Contradiction, that a Mode should be taken from Matter, and exist without it: For indeed if we well consider the Nature of a Mode, we shall find that it cannot so much as be in our Thought con∣ceiv'd as separated from it. For tho' we can have a clear perception of Substance, whether Material or Immaterial, without their Modes; yet by no means can we conceive those Modes, without the said Substances, since it is their very Nature to affect and diversifie Substances.
III. The Opinion of the Ancients about the Nature of a Body. Wherefore the Ancient Philosophers did demon∣strate, that a Body consists of a concurrence of Figure, Magnitude and Resistance; because they found nothing but Matter was extended in Length, Depth and Breadth; nor any other thing besides it, that could not abide its like in the same place with it, but pusheth it thence, and excludes Pene∣tration. For herein do Material Substances differ from Spiritual, because the former fall under our Senses, carry a bulk with them, and are subject to the Touch. By the word Touch, we do not only un∣derstand the Sense so called, which is peculiar to Animals, and whereby they feel External Bodies; but that more general, whereby 2 Bodies touch one another with their Surfaces, and whereby they are intimately close to one another. For it is the property of Material things only, to touch and be touched, and to be joyned together by a kind of middle Term; which is so evident, that it cannot be question'd by any that either make use of their Imagination, or perceive any thing by the Senses: As LUCRETIUS in his First Book tells us,
IV. How a Spirit is said to be extended. But some it may be will object here, that a Spirit also is Extended, and yet is is excluded from participating of the Nature of a Body. To which I Answer, That when a Spirit is said to be ex∣tended, this is not to be understood according to the threefold dimension of Bodies, which we ima∣gine; but with respect to its Power and Energy, whereby a Spirit diffuseth its active Force, some∣times through a larger, and at other times through a lesser part of the Bodily Substance; so that in case there was no Body or Space, a Spirit could