Extension, so neither can a spiritual Substance without Cogitation: And therefore it is necessary that Cogitation do constitute a Spirit in its spiritual Nature, as Extension constitutes a Body in its sen∣sible and divisible Nature. Forasmuch a•• according to ARISTOTLE, that is suppos'd to belong to the Essence of any thing, without which it cannot be understood.
II. Some think there is no Substance but what is Material. And whereas some suppose they cannot conceive an Angel without Extension, and so confound the Notion of substance with that of Extension; this proceeds only from a false prejudice they have en∣tertained, viz. that there is nothing Intelligible, but what is likewise Imaginable, which certainly is a very great mistake; for Angels and all o∣ther Spiritual Substances, cannot be reached by our Imagination, but only by our Intellect. For all Men generally take an Extended Being, to be somewhat Imaginable, in which there are various parts of a determinate Magnitude and Figure, and whereof the one is not the other; which Notion in no wise can agree with Spirits.
III. Spirit is a general name to Angels and Daemons. By the Name Spirit, therefore we are here to understand a Finite Thinking Substance, altoge∣ther independent on, and free from Matter: Un∣der, which Angels, Daemons and Intelligences are comprehended; neither is there any Distinction be∣tween them, save only that the Angels are Good, and the Devils Evil; that these aim at the De∣struction of Mankind, the other assist their Sal∣vation; these abide in Sin, the others continue in Grace; these are bound in Hell, the other enjoy the Vision of God in Heaven: All other things, as Essence, Existence, Knowledge, Power, the taking up of Bodies, Talking together, &c. being common to them both.
IV. The Angels are Imma∣terial Sub∣stances. From the Definition of a Spirit or Immaterial Substance, we may with great Evidence conclude, that Angels are Pure Spirits, or as DIONYSIUS in his fourth Book concerning Divine Names, saith, Free from Matter, and Incorporeal. Because a Thinking and an Extended Substance, are altoge∣ther distinct from each other, so that the one of them can be clearly perceived without the other. For we most clearly perceive a Spirit or Thinking Substance without a Body; and on the contrary, a Body without a Spirit. Now things that are thus distinguisht, cannot agree to one and the same Sub∣ject: Because these Attributes are altogether differ∣ent; and there can be no greater opposition be∣tween Attributes of Substance, than Diversity. And therefore to say, that Extension and Cogitation agree to one and the same Subject, is in effect to affirm, that one and the same Subject can have two Natures or Essences, which cannot be said of a Simple thing without a Contradiction. Because Cogitation and Extension are not only two Essen∣tial Attributes, but also constitute the nature of the thing to which they are attributed, and are more inconsistent, than Blackness and Whiteness, Heat and Cold, in the same Subject. For Heat and Cold may succeed one another in the same Subject, and the same thing which is Cold now, may afterward become Hot: But it is altogether Contradictory that Cogitation and Extension should be in the same simple Subject, and constitute two Natures at once, or Successively.
V. Forasmuch as Angels are Indivi∣sible, they are likewise Incorpo∣real. Moreover, if Angels were Material, they might be divided; for Divisibility is a Concomitant of
Extension; but Angels are not Divisible, therefore they are not Corporeal or Extended. The Minor is thus proved: The Essence of an Angel consists in Cogitation, which admits of no Division; or no body 〈◊〉〈◊〉 the half of a Thinking Being; where∣fo•••• Angels are exempt from matter, and from any Corporeity, how subtil soever the same may be con∣ceived.
VI. The effects of Angels proves their Incor∣poreity. The Immateriality of Angels may be made out from some Effects that exceed all Human Power, and the utmost activity of Bodily force: Such as are the Antient▪ Idol Oracles; the Speech of PEOPLE POSSEST, which are often in those Languages, which the possessed party does not understand; the Penetration of Bodies, and such like, which are an incontestable proof of Intelligent Natures, and which exert their Activity without the help of any Body. Besides we Read in Scripture that a vast mult tude of Devils entred one Body, Mark 5. yea, a whole Legion, which according to the most common Ac∣count contains 6666, which is absolutely impossi∣ble, if the Devils have Bodies and take up a de∣terminate place.
VII. Whether Angels be capable of Generation, They who assert Angels to be Compound Be∣ings, and to have Bodies, tho' much purer, and of a more subtil matter than ours, endeavour to con∣firm their Opinion from Gen. 6. where it is said, that the Sons of God came in unto the Daughters of Men, and they bare Children to them, and the same were Mighty Men or Giants. Which could not be, except we suppose the Angels to have Bodies; Spirits, as purely such, being incapable of Gene∣ration.
VIII. What we are to un∣derstand by the Sons of God in Scripture. But this place is wrongly interpreted; for by the Sons of God in that place we are not to understand Angels, but the Posterity of Seth, who imitating the Pious conduct of Enos, did worship God, and call upon his Name; but their Posterity degenera∣ting from the Piety of their Fore-fathers, and plung∣ing themselves into Carnal Concupiscence, joyned themselves with the Daughters of Men, that is, with Cain's Posterity; from which Conjunction Giants were born, that is, monstrous and deformed Bodies, as a Punishment of their Lust. For it is contrary to Reason to suppose, that Angels can Generate. Wherefore, the Fathers of these Gi∣ants were not Angels, but Men, as the Scripture sufficiently declares, Gen. 6. 3. My Spirit shall not always strive with Man, for that he is Flesh.
IX. Objection that the Angels will be equal to God in the Simplicity of their Natures. But will some say, if the Angels be altogether exempt from Composition, and any Matter what∣soever, they will be as Simple as God himself as being the one as well as the other Pure Spirits, having only an Essence, and some Modes, which do not hinder Simplicity.
X. The Simpli∣city that is in God is very differ∣ent from the Simpli∣city which is in Angels To which I Answer, that tho' neither in God, nor the Angels there be any Composition of Matter and a Substantial Form, yet are not the Angels exempt from all other Composition, as consisting of Potentiality and Act, of Essence and Existence: Which Composition is not to be found in God, for∣asmuch as the Divine Modes are only distinguisht by Reason (that is, our way of Understanding) from the Essence of God. Wherefore the School∣men call Angels and Souls Impure, and Imperfect Acts, but God the most Pure and perfect Act. Hence it is that DESCARTES in the 23 Article of the first Book of his Principles, Teacheth, that our Mind (and the same is to be understood of Angels)