CHAP. VIII. That GOD is Eternal, or without Beginning and End.
I. The Error of some, who say, that God was the Efficient Cause of himself. THo' almost all Philosophers agree in this, that there is a GOD, and that he governs the World; yet don't all of them conceive his Exi∣stence after one and the same manner. Some of them are of Opinion, that GOD had some kind of Beginning, and tho' the same were before all Ages; yet that he was born or produced as all other Things. But forasmuch as it was unbecoming the Divine Majesty to proceed from any other, and that he who is the Author of all Good, should derive his Being from another, they asserted himto be his own Efficient Cause, and that he so proceeded from himself.
II. This Opi∣nion de∣stroys the Nature of God. But this Opinion does not so much oppose Rea∣son, as it destroys the very Nature of God: For how could God produce himself, since this supposeth that before his Production he was not, because he was then to be produced, and yet was at the same time, forasmuch as he did then influence his own Production, which are absolute Contradictions. And whatever may be said in this case, we must allow some Principle of the Divine Production, which is absolutely repugnant to the Nature of God. For we no sooner consider the Nature of GOD, but we find him to be the Most perfect Being, which excludes all Imperfections, that is, any bounds or limitation of his Perfections, and includes all Per∣fections, and consequently also Existence, by which he is distinguish'd from all other things.
III. Necessary Existence is contain'd in the Na∣ture of God. For tho' whatsoever we conceive be apprehended by us as Existing; yet we find that Existence doth not belong to God and the Creatures in the same manner. For in the Conception of Crea∣tures, whose Perfections are finite, only Contingent and Possible Existence is contained; whereas in the Notion of God, Necessary Existence is included, as being an Eternal Perfection; insomuch that it is as obvious to our knowledge that GOD exists, as it is to a Mathematician, that a Triangle hath three Angles equal to two right ones. For as it is the Nature of a Triangle to have three Angles equal to two right ones; so likewise it is the Nature of God, to be necessarily Existent, and therefore as he exists now, it must be acknowledg'd that he hath existed from all Eternity.
IV. They who distinguish God's Es∣sence from his Exi∣stence, takes away his Eternity. They who do not mind this, are very liable to Error, and to ascribe to God simple Duration instead of Eternity: For by distinguishing Exi∣stence from Essence in God▪ as in other Created Beings, they imagine Succession of Time to have place in him, and by this means divide that which is Infinite, into Parts, and assign differences of Duration to it. Hence it is that some demand, Whether God hath not existed longer now, than when he first Created the VVorld; or whether he did not exist longer before the Creation of the VVorld, than the Time that has run from the Beginning of the VVorld till now. Which Que∣stions are occasion'd by their separating the Essence of God from his Existence, and supposing that the Eternity of God may be understood, without the contemplation of his Essence; or because they have not distinguish'd Duration from Eternity, but have concluded them to be confounded together. For Duration is an Attribute of the Existence of things, not of their Essence. Who will not say that the Propositions, Twice three make six; Nothing is made out of Nothing; which are only said to be true according to their Essence, that they have con∣tinued longer now than at any other time? Where∣fore Duration is only an Affection of Existence; whereas Eternity cannot be conceived without the Divine Essence; and forasmuch as the Existence of God is contain'd in the Conception of his Es∣sence, we are also to attribute Eternity to him, and not Duration.