COncerning the first of these, he makes his first Conclusion thus; There is a Causal virtue put forth in a Subordinate way by some under Christ, to bring the formality or specifical be∣ing of an Ecclesiastical Office to a person or party that is Called thereunto, or stands possessed thereof.
Alas▪ what mighty words are these, and how easily might the businesse of this Proposition have been expressed to the Capa∣city of any Reader, if he had said, there is some power under Christ to Constitute Ecclesiastical Officers; there is no need of such high and difficult Terms of Causal virtue, Formality, or Ec∣clesiastical being, which do amuse a weak Capacity, and no way satisfie an Intelligent.
The Drift of his Conclusion is to prove, that there is an outward Call necessary to a Minister, which, he saith, is by none denyed, but by Anabaptists and Familists, which folly and mad∣nesse labours (as he saith) with the loathsomnesse of it self: so he contemns them, but truly they are now grown a Considera∣ble Enemy; but I let them passe to answer for themselves, which I am considen•• they cannot justly; and indeed I grant this whole Conclusion, and let alone his proofs of it. But yet because he placeth a necessity upon it as surely is Tru••h, I would ask, whe∣ther the necessity be not required out of the part of such as are to receive the Pastor or Elder? and I am sure he must yield it; for there is no reason Men should receive such a P••stor who is not lawfully called, (to use his own phrase;) but then why doth he despise the Bishops Seal and Parchment in a Box, as he speaks page 40. when there can be none other Evidence to the people of his Call, but this? And again, because this is a•• 〈…〉〈…〉 a Causal virtue, which he useth, I shall adde something 〈◊〉〈◊〉