Sect. 2.
His second Proposition is as bad, That when a thing is in motion,* 1.1 it will eternally be in motion unlesse something else stop it; This is equally false with the other: First, Animal Motions he grants presently after, Men measu∣ring other things by themselves, judge they are weary, and so go to rest. This instance granted in a Man, confutes that indefinite term, when a thing is in motion; and what he speaks of Men, there is the same reason of all sensi∣tive creatures, which abide a lassitude or wearinesse, as well as man, and must have their Sabbath, their alter∣nam requiem to refresh them, or they cannot subsist; and therefore, when they are in long motions, go to rest themselves; and certainly a man may justly say, that all the locall motions of other things, as well as Animals,* 1.2 is to rest; the bladder, which moved it self before from un∣der the Water, rests it self upon the Water; the Plum∣met of Lead upon the earth; every thing, when it gets its own place, rests in that: So in violent motions, when you shoot an Arrow upward, it makes hast downward of it self, against the violence, and gets to the earth, where it may, and doth rest; so that the nature of eve∣ry thing is so composed, that as it is unquiet out of its fit and natural place, so it is quiet and rests in it: But he seems to give a reason for both Propositions, namely, that nothing can change it self.
This may have some resemblance of truth,* 1.3 in respect of the essence of things, because every change seems to imply a corruption and destruct••on of what it was chan∣ged from into that it was changed into, and nothing can