Sect. 10.
But you may object, a certain portion is not allotted to every single man,* 1.1 but any part of the world; neither is it lawful for one to subdue the whole, for then it would be lawful for one man, if he had power to deprive others of the necessaries for life, yea to kill another, which seem's to op∣pose what he had said before, when God decreeing to man the use of this life did decree likewise to bestow upon him the use of these things usefull to his life, which, saith he, one man cannot take from another, unless in extreme necessi∣ty, but he doth subvert the end which God intended in the creation of another. To this he adde's another objection concerning the birth••right of the Eldest Son, who, he saith,* 1.2 hath title to his Father's estate without compact; this second I esteem very weak, and so meddle not with what he write's concerning it; but the first, I am perswaded, is of invincible force, and his answer to it is miserable; his answer is page 103. we answer, saith he, not onely in extreme necessities a man may subdue the world,* 1.3 such a necessity being granted (such a necessity is impossi∣ble say I, because the world cannot be necessary to re∣lieve any man's extreme necessity, but onely very little parts of it) but also if any profit or commodity may be pro∣mised to arise thence, as any Lord may use his good, nei∣ther can he offend against that justice by which he is bound to render to his neighbour that which is his; the rest in that Paragraph is but flourished to this purpose; now let a man consider how this satisfies the preceding ar∣gument, that argument was drawn from the end which God intended in the creating of both these, the preserva∣tion