Page 359
Sect. 6.
[And without him was nothing made that was made] I believe, that,* 1.1 before their glosses had come to this Text, a man could not possibly have put down more distinct Words; was Heaven, or Earth, or any thing else then what is comprised in all? if not, then it was not made without him; he made it, who made all things; yea, but (say they) this must be understood of all the things of the Gospell; I aske, were other things made? if they were, then they were made by him, and without him nothing was made, that was made; I know they will returne to their former answear, and say, it must be un∣derstood of the subjecta materia, which was the Gospell, that none of those things that were made were made without him; but let a man consider whether it be rea∣sonable to refer this (all things) to such a business; which is treated of two or three verses after, or rather to those things which immediately follow, that is, the things that are made;* 1.2 they have an exception likewise against this Word [by] all things were made by him; that signifye's an Instrument, (say they) and by this Christ should be onely here an Instrumentall Cause, by which God wrought these things; so Smalcius in refutatione libelli de divinâ verbi incarnati naturâ. cap. 11. pag. 68. in my edition, 1614. it is true, he grant's that this Word [by] is often used for a principal cause, as is most evident, as we say, that this house was built by this man, not by his Axe or Hammer, no not by his Servants, yea all things are said to be made by God; but he saye's, they, who urge this Argument, must prove, that it is never used otherwise; I say, that is not necessary, in