observable; there is no one, but the fourth to the Ro∣mans, which hath this word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, which we render World, in it, and sometimes the word new added, which might well expound his sense, as in St. Peter; and sometimes no such intent, as he would have it, to sig∣nify the future World so in those places to the Hebrews; but then, for this place to the Romans, although there is this very word 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 in it, as the H••ir of the world, yet Christ was Heir of this world, and the promise was made to Abraham, that all nations in the earth should be blessed in his seed, and so his Seed should be Heir, Lord of all the world, and have kingdom and rule over all nati∣ons, ever here on earth. These are the principall things I observe amongst them, to justifie their Comment upon that Text; and it appear's, that they have not shewed, that this word (〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉) which we render made, was ever used for regenerating, much lesse for the intention of it; again, we may marke, that this word, 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, is never used for the world to come or heaven, without an additi∣on; when it is put absolutely, as here, it signifye's the present World. It will be now time to set down mine own conceipt, and vindicate it from such exceptions as they make against it [he was in the world] that is, the word, not the light, because, in the last Clause, where it is said, the World knew him not, him is 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, in the Masculine gender, which agree's to the Word, not to the Light, which is the Neuter gender.
Well then, he was in the world, the great world, the universe, is what was mean't by the word was in the world; and this must be true, because the Word was God, and he is every where, he in the world, and the world in him; and this is something that a man learn's here for his Faith, that God is alwayes in the world, preserving and