Sect. 5.
* 1.1His second Argument is, That [if this proportion should be observed, then it were injustice to give more than a man deserves.] This Argument may be blown away with saying, that giving, or not giving, have nothing to doe with justice; giving belong's to another vertue, ca••led Liberality; acts of Justice are acts of Du••ty; acts of Giving are acts of Bounty: but this I may tell him, that it were an act of Injustice for that Judge or Um∣pire,* 1.2 in a Case of Commutative Justice, betwixt John A-stiles and John An-oakes, who should make John A-stiles to give John An-oakes but a little more than the Arithmetical proportion was due to him; he may give him out of his own purse what he pleaseth; but, out of justice, he can compell John A-stiles to give no more, or rather pay no more, than a shilling-worth of money for a shilling-worth of work, unless for costs, or cause of 〈◊〉〈◊〉: So that▪ here▪ his second Argument against 〈…〉〈…〉