worthy the place of more worth, and the more worthy the place of less worth.
The third kind is of particular men one with another, and this they tearm Commutative Justice, which con∣sist's in exchanges and the trade and negotiation one man hath with another; to this they assign the mea∣sure Arithmetical, which is so much as the other, five for five: he, who hath right to five shillings, must have five shillings, and no more; he, who hath so much dam¦mage, must▪ in justice, have so much satisfaction, and no more, without any consideration of merit or deme∣rit; vertue or vice; a shilling's worth of work must be payd with a shilling: this is the generall Doctrine which is delivered by Writers concerning Justice. Let us see what he except's. What he writ is not true; Justice of Actions is not by Writers divided into Com∣mutative and Distributive; when he saith, Justice of Actions, he must understand Justice in its generall no∣tion, which, by the consent of all Writers, is first divi∣ded into legall or common Justice, and particular; there are many acts of Justice which are not compr••hended under these two; I mean not onely the acts of those that are called Theological Virtues, Faith, Hope, and Charity, which are just acts, but are not contained in this Division; but there are many acts of Moral Ju∣stice which are none of these; as thus, It is a gallant and heroick act of justice, for a man to adventure his life for the Safety of his Countrey; justice it is, because due to his Countrey, that any one part should perish rather than the whole; but neither Commutative, nor Distributive Justice, as may appear. It is a just action, in the danger of the Common-wealth running to ha∣zard, for a wise man to interpose his advise, to rescue