Page 270
Sect. 13.
[As if not the Cause, but the degrees of daring made Fortitude; or not the Cause, but the quantity of a gift made liberality.] I wonder, when he read any writer of note so absurd,* 1.1 as he make's all Philosophers in gener∣all: for Fortitude, they make it (as all other) to consist in mediocrity; it is excelled by temerity, or rashnesse; it is defective in Cowardlinesse; and these are both degenerations from the vertue Fortitude; which For∣titude is to dare doe that (what danger soever be in it) which Reason prescribe's; and to forbeare to doe that (what advantage soever shall accrue) which just Reason shall forbid. Take an Instance in that man of God, David, in Sam. 17. we may read that he durst en∣counter with a Lyon and a Beare, to rescue an innocent Lamb out of their mouthes: he dare's fight with Goliah in compleat armour, with nothing but a sling and a stone, to rescue his Country; yet a little after we shall read of him flying out of his Wifes Window for safety: yea, in the 26. of the same booke, we shall find Da∣vid, and onely Abishai with him, entring the whole ar∣my of Saul: an Act than which nothing could be more bold or hazardous; and taking his Speare, and bottle from his holster, and yet, he durst not touch his person, for committing of treason; each an act of true Forti∣tude, to dare so much, when it was fit, and dare doe no more, when it was fit; no not for a Kingdome: the Rules of Fortitude, are, not to feare, or hope for any thing, but upon the guidance of right Rea∣son; So that the daring to say, or doe unjust actions, is opposite to fortitude: I may say the like of liberality, it hath two vices nigardlinesse and prodigality; It is pro∣digality,