Thus have men Philosophiz'd by reason: but the under∣standing is not filled with this; as you may observe a Country-man, when he see's another write, walke, speake, and the like, he can tell you, these are the ef∣fects of some excellent principles in that man who doth them; ask him, what it is? he can, with all the world, tell you, it is his Soule; but ask, what that Soule is? he is at a stand, he knowe's nothing of it; such are our thoughts of God, from whose works of his we know there is a cause which bringe's these mighty things to passe, which we call God; but what that God is, who doth them, we are at a losse, by all the reason man can find out; for as a dog can apprehend his master's kind∣nesse to him, or his anger, yet cannot know the excel∣lency of his Master's Wisdome, power, &c. because he is in a lower rank of things then man is; much lesse is man able to reach at that infinite excellency of God, be∣ing many degrees much lower then God, than any Creature is below man. This is the knowledge a man may have of God; if there be any thing else, it must be that other way, in which many Divines have trod, besides these negatives of imperfections, to conceive these things we call perfections to be in a much more in∣finitely excellent manner in him who is God: So a husbandman may know that a learned man exceed's him in knowledge, and that this knowledge is in divine, naturall, and morall things; but what that knowledge of his is, he cannot tell, unlesse that learned man reveale it to him; so it is in respect of God, we know he hath excellencies beyond us, that these consist in these or these eminencies; but what is the nature of these emi∣nencies, no man can know, but he to whom God re∣veale's them; yet he cannot choose but desire to know