Sect. 2.
He goe's on [But because Covenants of mutual trust where there is a feare on either part (as hath been saide in the former chap.) are invalid] The place he mentioned is pag. 68▪ where he deliver's that [If a Covenant be made wherein neither of the p••••••les performe presently, but trust one another; in the condition of mere nature (which is a condition of war of every man against every man) upon any reasonable suspition it is voyd. but if there be a com∣mon power set over them both, with right and force suffici∣ent to compell performance,* 1.1 it is not voyd.]
This proposition, although it make a faire shew, up∣on a superficial view; yet we shall find it, upon diligent examination, to be full of unhappy errours. Had he said, such Covenants are dangerous to be kept: and that men with wicked principles will not keep them, he had said somewhat that might have borne him out in it; but to