Sect. 2.
* 1.1Then secondly, let us consider that here is not in this Charter expressed any right a man hath over other men, but this right is equally granted to Man over those crea∣tures there specified, but none to any man over another; Therefore all right that any man hath to doe any thing to another must either be by nature, as Parents, in regard of whose origination of their Children's lives and educa∣•••••••• of them, they have naturally a right to governe and 〈◊〉〈◊〉 any things concerning them; or else it must be by 〈◊〉〈◊〉 Covenant, concession or yielding, expressed or 〈◊〉〈◊〉 of one to the other; but in the original Charter 〈◊〉〈◊〉 is not any grant or priviledge given to one over 〈◊〉〈◊〉; and therefore barbarous acts of inhumanity, 〈◊〉〈◊〉 it is to be supposed that no man would yield 〈◊〉〈◊〉 should act upon him, no man can have right to 〈◊〉〈◊〉; Upon these Considerations his proposition must 〈◊〉〈◊〉 perish, when he saith, every man hath right to any 〈◊〉〈◊〉; but he seemes to prove it thus. [For seeing all 〈◊〉〈◊〉 he willeth must therefore be good to him, in his owne ••••dgement, because he willeth them, and may tend to his pre∣••••••vation some way or other, or he may judge so, and we have ••ade him judge thereof, Sect. 8. If he had said, I have ••ade him judge thereof, the force of the Argument would quickly have been shat••ered, because his authority is weake to constitute a Judge in so weighty affaires; but when he said we, I wonder who he meanes. I am sure I was none of them, nor doe I remember to have read any other, but himself, of that mind, That every man must be judge of his own Cause: I know every man will judge and act according to his judgement, who is an honest and