meritoriously draw from thence a great re∣spect of Honour, according to the generality of their Administration and Employments, which an inferiour and more con••••ned Magi∣strate cannot have.
The name of a Knight is a name of Digni∣ty, and a Degree, as is the name of Duke, Earl, &c. and in all Actions he shall be slyled Knight; otherwise the Writ shall abate.
A Knight also must be named by both his Chri••tian and Surnames, as Sir A. B. Knight. But those Degrees honourable that are made by Patent, may be named only by their Chri∣stian Names, and by their Title of Honour, as Gilbert Earl of Shrewsbury: and that for two causes; First, because of their solemn Creati∣ons (& nomen dicitur à noscendo;) Secondly, there is but one part of that Title of Honour within England, and therefore it is certain what person he is; but otherwise of Knights, as it is certainly known in the 8 Edw. 4.24. a. And Prisot, Chief Justice, saith, in the 32 Hen. 6. 26. b. That if an Esquire be made a Knight, he loseth his Name of Esquire; but though a Knight be made a Nobleman, or of any higher Degree, he doth still retain the name of Knight, and so ought to be styled in all Writs.
Also if a man do recover in an Action by the Name of Iohn Stiles, Esq and afterwards be made a Knight, he must sue his Scire Facias by the Name of Knight.
And this name shall not die with him; for if they were bound in an Obligation by the Name of Gentlemen or Esquires, and after∣wards one is made a Knight, and dieth, the Plaintiff in the Action to be brought against his Executors, must name him Knight, other∣wise the Writ shall abate.
If a Grant be made to H. D Knight, when he is not a Knight, it is a void Grant: but if it be a Feoffment with Livery, the Livery maketh it good. If the Plaintiff or Deman∣dant do in his Writ name the Defendant or Tenant Esquire when he is a Knight, the Writ shall not only abate, but also the Plaintiff may not have another Writ by Iourneys ac∣compt.
But by the Statute made 1 Edw. 6. chap. 7. it is amongst other things enacted, That al∣beit any person or persons, being Justices of Assize, Justices of Goal-delivery, or Justices of the Peace within any of the King's Domi∣nions, or by any other of the King's Com∣missions whatsoever, shall have the fortune to be made or created Duke, Archbishop, Mar∣quess, Earl, Viscount, Bishop, Baron, Knight, Justice of the one Bench, or of the other, Ser∣jeant at Law, or Sheriff, yet that notwith∣standing he and they shall remain Justices and Commissioners, and have full power and au∣thority to execute the same in like manner and form as he or they might or ought to have done before the same. By the Satute of 1 Hen. 5. chap. 5. it is enacted as followeth, That every Writ, Original of Actions per∣sonal, Appeals, and Indictments, and in which an Exigit shall be awarded to the names of the Defendants, in such Writs, O∣ginal, Appeals, and Indictments shall be made the Additions of their Estate, Degrees, &c. And a little after it is provided, That if the said Writs of Actions Personal be not accord∣ding to the Record and Deed, by the Surplu∣sage of the Additions aforesaid, that for this cause they are not.
Iohn S••iles Gent. is bound by Obligation to one W. B. the Obligor is afterwards made Knight, the Bond is forfeited; W. B. by his Attorney draweth a Note or Title for an Ori∣ginal, according to the Defendants Degree, although it varies from the Original Specialty, as it ought to be made by the Statute: But the Cursitor mistaking, did make the Original on∣ly according to such Addition as was specified in the Obligation, omitting his Degree or Dignity, and the Entry of the Capias alias & pluris was according to the said Original; But in the Exigit and Proclamation, and En∣try of it, the Defendant was named according to his Degree of Dignity: upon a Writ of Er∣ror after a Judgment, doubt was, If this might be amended in another Court than where the Original was mâde; and at the last it was resolved by all the Court, That the Re∣cord should be amended by the Cursitor, and made according to the Note and Title deliver∣ed unto him by the Attorney.
It appeareth in our Books of Law, that the highest and lowest Dignities are universal; for as if a King of a Foreign Nation come into England by his Majestie's leave (as it ought to be) in this case he shall sue and be sued by the Name of a King; So shall a Knight sue or he sued by the name of a Knight, wheresoever he received that Degree of Honour: But o∣therwise it is as if a Duke, Marquess, Earl, or other Title of Honour given by any Foreign King or Emperor, yea, although the King by his Letters Patents of safe Conduct do name him Duke, or by what other Foreign Title of Dignity he hath; For Experience teacheth that Kings joyned in League together by a certain mutual (and as it were a natural) power of Monarchs (according to the Law of Nations) have admitted one anothers Ser∣vants, Subjects, and Ambassadors graced with the Title of Knighthood. Therefore though a Knight receive his Dignity of a Foreign Prince, he is so to be stiled in all Legal Pro∣ceedings within England. And Kings were wont to send their Sons unto their Neighbour Princes to receive Knighthood at their hands, thinking that it was more honourable to take Arms of some other, le••t affection might seem to prevent Judgment, when the Father gave them that Honour. Thus our King Henry the Second sent unto David King of Scots, and