§ If thou wilt fall down and worship me.
Here is impudency come to its height, and the Devil shewing himself in his own colours indeed. Neither of the former temptations, had so visibly and desperately invited Christ to impiety, as this doth with open face: for in the first perswasion, to turn stones into bread, there was some colour of Christs own benefit, for he was now hungry, and bread might have been a thing of welcomness to him: and in the second, to have flown in the air, there might be some colour of his honour and repute, in shewing himself so mira∣culous before the people; as we read that some vain men have sought esteem by such a vain course, as Icarus mentioned by Suetonius in the life of Nero, chap. 12. And Simon Magus, so reported of by all Ecclesiastical Historians, and both these not very many years after this time. And Bladud mentioned in our own stories, if he lived at any time at all. But to be invited in plain anddown right terms, to fall down and worship the Devil, hath no colour at all upon it but naked impiety. What, did not the Devil know Christ who he was? that we have proved before that he did: or, did he think that Christ knew not who he was? that he could not think, if he knew Christ as he did. What shall we say then to this damned overture of having Christ to adore him? why? here he joyneth all his power of temptation together; and would 1. bring Christ into a more low fall than he had done Adam; and 2. makes a stroke desperately at him to have bruised his head, whereas it was told him only he should bruise his heel; and all this, because being of an intolerable impudency, he would obtrude any thing, even beyond all sense, reason, and modesty, to compass his own design; and seeing Christ had condescended so far as to be hurryed by him in the air, he would leave no way unattempted of tempting, if so it might have been possible to have corrupted innocency now, as he did once in Adam; and to have power over his mind, as he saw he had so far over his body. And thus hath he done his worst, and shewed his Devilship to the utmost, to have brought the second A∣dam to have been a sinner like the first, but here the seed of the Woman that was promi∣sed Adam, bruised the head of the Serpent, who would have bruised his.
Ver. 10. Get thee hence Satan.
Lukes expressing of this hath bred some scruple, for he hath phrased it 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, rendred by our English, Get thee behind me Satan; being the very same words that our Sa∣viour useth to Peter, Mark 8. 33. when he would have perswaded him not to have been Christ, as the Devil would here have perswaded him to be Antichrist: Hence hath a doubting been bred with some, whether Christ commanded the Devil clean away, any more than he did Peter, or only commanded him either to get behind his back, or not to offer to advise or direct him in any thing further, as he had impudently done hitherto. The Syriack hath omitted that passage in Luke wholly, and so hath the Vulgar Latine; and Beza men∣tioneth four ancient Greek copies that wanted it also: But, saith he, in the other, and in Theophylact these words are found; and so are they in the Arabick, and most authentick copies, expositions and translations. Now the meaning of Christ in these words, is to pack Satan clean away from him indeed, as is apparent by the expression of Matthew, who saith only 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, be gone; and by the sequel it self, for Matthew telleth, that upon these words, the Devil departed; But Luke hath added the words 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉, Behind me, because he hath mentioned another temptation after this: and it would have seemed that Christ had not had command over the Devil, if he had bidden, Be gone Satan, and he had not de∣parted. Therefore though it were true indeed, that the Devil did depart upon these words, and tempt Christ no more, yet since it seemeth not so in Lukes method, therefore he used such an expression as was suitable and agreeing to his own method and order; and which might both serve the same sense that Matthew intended in his expression, and yet withall save the sense of Luke himself in regard of the ranking of these temptations. By the phrase