§ Into the holy City, and setteth him on a pinacle of the Temple.
There are two main scruples and questions arise out of these words: 1. Why the Devil bringeth Christ to this place in this temptation. And 2. whether his flying in the air, and standing on the Temple, were visible, or no.
As to the first; It cannot be doubted, but something more was in the Devils thoughts when he brought our Saviour hither, than meerly his precipitation, or casting down head∣long, or flying in the air: For had that been all, he might have found promontories, rocks, precipices by hundreds; from whence to have got him cast down, would have served the turn, as well as from hence, if his precipitation had been all that was intended and aimed at. But certainly there was some reflecting in Satans mind upon the very place, as well as upon the very thing. And that being apprehended what it was, if it be possible to apprehend it, it will help to resolve both the questions at once. Conjecture is all that we can go upon here, and it is better to conjecture at Satans mind in such a thing as this, than to be acquainted in it; and in a matter of this nature if one fail, in conjecture, it is as excusable on that hand, as it is difficult to hit aright on the other.
- 1. Therefore it may be conceived, that the Devil according to his constant practice, would make the utmost advantage he could of his deceipts in this passage and temptation: and that he meant not only evil to our Saviour, whom he had in hand, but some delusion also to the men of Jerusalem, amongst whom he brought him: For why should he take him from the solitude of the wilderness, into the middle of a City, if he meant no more than what he might have equally acted in that solitariness? or why should he set him upon the Temple, if he intented no more than what he might have done upon any pre∣cipice in the desert.
- 2. It seemeth therefore, and is very probable, that our Saviour as he flew in the air, and as he stood on the Temple, was visible and conspicuous to the eyes of the people: and that Satan acted thus, that the people might be deluded with some misapprehensions concerning him. And truly I cannot but conjecture, that he intented to deceive them with misprision concerning Elias, who was so much in their thoughts and expectation, to come personally as the fore-runner of the Messias: For he having been rapt away into the air, and so into heaven, when the Lord took him from the earth, as is related in the story of his transla∣tion, 2 King. 2. how readily might the people have their thoughts on him, when they saw a man in a mantle flying in the air, and taking his pitch upon the Temple, and away again? and this they might be deceived in the rather, because of the misconstruction which they blindly made of those words of the Prophet, Mal. 3. 1. Of the Angel of the Co∣venant coming to the Temple, which they understand of Elias, as see D. Kimch. in loc. But it will be said, what could Satan gain by this deceit? Why, this, that they would be confir∣med in the mistake of Elias his personal coming at the last converse among them, and so the preaching of the Baptist, and the appearing of Christ after him would be the less regarded.
- ...