SECTION LIX.
JOHN Chap. VII. from Ver. 11, to the end of the Chapter.
CHRIST at the Feast of Tabernacles.
THe pregenancy of the order here, speaks it self: In the two preceding Sections, Jesus was in the way up to the Feast, and now he is come there.
Now is the year of the World 3960, and the year of Christ 33 begun: both entring in this very month in which the Feast of Tabernacles was. The great year of the world, the fulness of time, the year of redemption and powring down of the Spirit. It was indeed the year of Jubilee, however the Jews would jumble their account [as see Maymon in Shemiatah veiobel. per. 10.] whether ignorantly or wilfully let them look to it. For count from the 7th. year of the rule of Joshua, when the wars of Canaan ended, and Jubilees be∣gan, and you have 1400 years to this present year that we are upon, just eight and twen∣ty Jubilees: this year the last that Israel must ever see. It is the confession of Zohar in Lev. 25. that the Divine glory should be freedom and redemption in a year of Jubilee. Com∣pare the sending out of the seventy Disciples neer upon the very instant when this Jubilee began, with the sounding of the Trumpet for the proclaiming of the Jubilee, Lev. 25. 9. and there is a fair equity and an answerableness to that type, in that very thing.
From this Feast of Tabernacles to the Passover at which time Christ suffered, was that last half year, of the last half seven mentioned Dan. 9. which compare with the last half year of Israels being in Egypt, in which time Moses did his Miracles, and which ended also at the Passover.
Among the many varieties of solemnity and festivity used at the Feast of Tabernacles▪ of which we have given account at large in another volume, there was the powring out of water fetched out of the fountain Siloam, with the wine of the drink-offering, and at night their most transportant joyfulness, expressed by their singing, dancing and the like jocund gestures, for that powring out of water: which by some, in Jerus. succah. fol. 55. col. 1. is interpreted to signifie the powring out of the holy Ghost: The consideration of this illustrates ver. 37, 38. where it is said, that on the last and great day of the Feast, Jesus cried, If any thirst, &c. He that believeth on me, out of his belly shall flow rivers of water, &c. Upon which words many believed him, because they had seen already so fair evidence of the gifts of the Spirit, in the powerfull works of himself and his Disciples: and yet the text saith here, The holy Ghost was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified: a far greater gift of that being yet behind.
The Sanhedrin would fain have been medling with him to have tried him for a false Pro∣phet, as may be gathered from their words ver. 52. but his hour was not yet come.
JOHN Chap. VIII.
A Woman taken in Adultery, &c.
IT is said in the conclusion of the former Chapter, that every one [of the Sanhedrin] went home, and here, Jesus went into the Mount of Olives: which joyns the story plain enough. Not that he lodged in mount Olivet in the open fields, but that he went to Bethany, and lodged in the House of Lazarus, of which we shall find confirmation in the next Secti∣on.
In the morning he comes to the Temple, and in the treasury, or the Court of the wo∣men, he sitteth down, and teacheth the people: For it was the custom for the Teachers of the people to sit when they taught, and those that were taught to stand about them. As he thus sits teaching, the Scribes and Pharisees bring a Woman to him taken in the act of Adultery, &c.
The Syriack wants this story: and Beza doubts it [a man always ready to suspect the text] because of the strangeness of Christs action, writing with his finger on the ground. Mihi ut ingenue loquar [saith he] vel ob hunc ipsum locum suspecta est haec historia. Whereas it speaks the style of John throughout, and the demeanor of the Scribes and Pharisees, and of Christ most consonantly to their carriage all along the Gospel. The snare that they laid for him in this matter, was various. That he should condemn the adul∣teress, but where was the adulterer? why brought they not him too? If he condemned her, he seemed to assume Judicial power: if he condemned her not, he seemed a contem∣ner