VERS. I.
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.
Of the Galileans.
IF this report concerning the Galileans was brought to our Saviour immediately after the deed was done, then was this Tragedy acted by Pilate, a little before the Feast of Dedication, for we find Christ going toward that Feast, Vers. 22. But the time of this slaughter is uncertain; for it is a question whether they that tell him this passage, relate it as news which he had not heard before, or only to draw from him his opinion concerning that affair, &c.
It is hotly disputed amongst some, as to the persons whom Pilate slew. And
I. Some would have them to have been of the Sect of Judas the Gaulonite, and that they were therefore slain because they denied to give tribute to Caesar. He is called in∣deed Judas of Galilee a 1.1, and there is little doubt but that he might draw some Galileans into his opinion and practise. But I question then, whether Christ would have made any kind of defense for such, and have placed them in the same level with these upon whom the Tower of Siloam fell, when it so plainly appears that he taught directly contrary to that perverse Sect and Opinion. However, if these were of that Sect (for I will not contend it) then do these who tell this to our Saviour seem to lay a snare for him, not much unlike that question they put to him: Is it lawful to give tribute to Caesar or no?
II. There is one that confounds this story with that of Josephus b 1.2 which he relates from him thus abbreviated, In Galiaea autem, &c. In Galilee there were certain Samari∣tans, who being seduced by a notorious Impostor, moved Sedition at Mount Gerizzim (where this Cheat promised them to shew them the sacred Vessels, which he falsly told them had been hid by Moses in that place.) Pilate sending his forces upon them supprest them, the greater of them were taken and adjudged to death * 1.3. I admire how this learned man should de∣liver these things, with so much confidence as even to chastise Josephus himself for his mi∣stake in his computation of the time for this story, concluding thus, cum revera tamen caedes, &c. When indeed this slaughter made upon the Samaritans by Pilate, seems to be that very slaughter of the Galileans, mentioned by St. Luke, Chap. XIII. 1.
Whereas in truth Josephus mentions not one syllable either of Galilee or Sacrifice, or the Galileans, but Samaritans: and it is something a bold thing to substitute rebelling Samaritans in the place of sacrificing Galileans. Nor is it propable that those that tell this matter to our Saviour, would put this gloss and colour upon the thing while they related it.
III. The feud and enmity that was between Pilate and Herod c 1.4 might be enough to incense Pilate to make this havock of the subjects of Herod.
〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉.
Whose blood Pilate mingled.
d 1.5 David swore to Abishai, As the Lord liveth, if thou touch the blood of this righteous man [Saul] 〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉〈 in non-Latin alphabet 〉 I will mingle thy blood with his blood. So Pilate min∣gled the blood of these sacrificers, with the blood of those sacrifices they had slain. It is remarkable that in Siphra e 1.6 the killing of the sacrifices may be well enough done, by strangers, by women, by servants, by the unclean, even those Sacrifices that are most holy, provided that the unclean touch not the flesh of them. And a little after, At the sprinkling of the blood the work of the Priest begins, and the slaying of them may be done by any hand whatever.
Hence was it a very usual thing for those that brought the Sacrifice to kill it them∣selves: and so probably these miserable Galileans were slaughtered, while they themselves were slaying their own sacrifices. For it is more likely that they were slain in the Tem∣ple whiles they were offering their sacrifices, than in the way, whiles they were bringing them thither.